Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISPLEASED

STRONG PROTEST BY MARLBOROUGH.

(Per Press Association.)

BLENHEIM, June 14

Strong words about the attitude taken ii]) by tlie Canterbury Progress League in the matter of Railway construction, were used at the annual meeting of the South Island Main Trunk League. Members remarked that Canterbury League was reducing Canterbury to tho level of,a dog in the manger, and the effect on public opinion through out the Dominion in relation to public works development Would hardly be advantageous to the southern province. On the motion of the newly elected President, (Mr E. H. Penny), they resolutioned for the circulation throughout N.Z. that this League is filled with as_ tonishment and indignation at tlie narrow mindedness and parochialism displayed by Canterbury Progress League, in refusing to co-operate with the people of Marlborough in urging tlie claims of the South Island Main Trunk in preference to Otira Tunnel and deliberate pervision of the supreme importance to the Dominion of linking up the main trunk line, and more unjustifiable because provision is already made and promised for Otira Tunnel and urges the completion of that work in the nea r future and that it is an undertaking that could not. have been prejudiced by the support to the larger project. Moreover, our League considers it ivas treat, od in cavalier fashion ' by Canterbuiy League, 'inasmuch as it was always able to count on the co-operation of Canterbury in the past years. This League trusts tbo selfishness of Canterbury League will be noted throughout New Zealand, and widely condemned as contrary to the best interests of the country in the matter of public works development.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19200614.2.44

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 14 June 1920, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
271

DISPLEASED Hokitika Guardian, 14 June 1920, Page 3

DISPLEASED Hokitika Guardian, 14 June 1920, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert