Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NEXT DAVIS CUP

SYDNEY, January 28

Kir Norman Brookes was looking for trouble when, at the tennis dinner on Saturday night, he complained against the Davis Cup rule, which says that one' out of three Davis Cup ‘matches', wh’p/n |Au|stminaia are the holders, should be played in Now Zealand. The prompt and vigorous reply of the New Zealand tennis president was timely and. expected. Generally tennis comment here does not support" Mr Brookes, but there are an unsportsmanlike few who ‘‘do not see why New Zealand should be in it at all.” The newspapers, during the match were scrupulous in calling it “Australasia versus British Isles,” but in other directions it was “Australia versus British Isles.” Naturally New Zealanders without being petty, were a little hurt. It was not as if New Zealand is clinging to Australia’s coat-tails in order to be carried to a little cheap glory ; New Zealanders in the past, have very completely won their nameless place in the “Australasia” of tennis. Australia would never have climbed so high in tennis records without Anthony Wilding, and it is only the tragedy of war, which carried off that champion and other promising younger New Zealanders, which leaves the Dominion ‘unrepresented in this Australasian Dayis Cup team. Mr Brookes’s weather argument in the circumstances, is really funny. No Davis Cup match was ever played under such adverse weather conditions as the one just completed. Nearly every one of the matches had to be broken off or postponed owing to per. sistent heavy rain. Yet Mr Brookes says that Australians and Americans do not want to go to New Zealand boa use of the possibility of unsuitable weather. The “Sun” newspaper, in its column,.has a laugh at Mr Brookes over this matter. Then Mr Brookes urges an amendment of the rules to permit the holders of the Cup always to play on thoir own ground. This is to allow the Australians to refuse to go to’ New Zealand to defend tlie Cup in New Zealand. Just what he is going to do when the team includes New Zealanders —as it will again eventually—is not explained.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19200206.2.34

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1920, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
355

NEXT DAVIS CUP Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1920, Page 2

NEXT DAVIS CUP Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1920, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert