Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LIBERAL PRINCIPLES.

A CALL *FOR RATIONAL PROGRESS. ' ; TELLING RE-STATEMENT BY ; SIR JOHN FINDLAY, HP. ( “ The first aim of- a rational progressive Liberal,party should be to avoid the patchwork of oppor- . tunistic proposals which heretofore have mainly constituted the Liberal party’s programme, and to devise a system of scientific human progress, | based upon correlated and mutually ; helpful principles of social reform.” j

Thus declared, in a recent inter- , view in the “ Lyttelton Times,” Sir { John Fiudlay, the Liberal member. ■ for Hawke’s Bay, whose maiden speech in tlie House of Representatives w.ill-long be remembered for its clear presentment .of the fundalpental principles of taxation, and for ijs candid, though constructive criticism ol the .National Government., , humanity and property. . “A fuller and clearer recognition-' of the rule that human personality and its protection, promotion, and vindication must 7 (stated Sir John Findlay to the /‘ Lyttelton Times ” interviewer) “ count for more ill the ej'e of the ■ law than mere property, iriterests. Our legal system still strikingly- reflects the view that -property- is more important than person's, wealth than the welfare of the proletariat, and offences against the former are in'/ general more severely punished than offences against/-the view expressed-' by diie of The greatest Scottish Lord Justices from his seat 011 tlie,Bench that tlie landed interest alone/lias; a, right to be represented in Government, and the view uiideriyiug-ifcarly all doctrines of orthodox' economics that wealth

and its increase was the chief conceri 1 r of legi si at ion,- have still too great a potency in - these days. Trpductioii' Has been far too'exclu-J sively regarded by Governments. Tke distribution and consumption of national wealth are almost as important as ■ its-- Aim.q'Uut. Great national -wealth colreehtrated in a. few hands, in’eails despotism.oll the one hand and, degradation on the other,^whiteywasteful; alid u vicious consumption may demoralise a nation. /' v "U y -j./; / DECREASE; HUMAN WASTE. . “ The paramount aim of govern nientj therefore, should .not be wealth aud its increase, but human /waste aiicl .its./decrease. In; .this view /true progress should' be expressed as ‘ a/progrc,ssive economy of was'.e ’T'.lor- this inakes .hunKfu well-being—physical, '.mental, Arid moral—the-cardinal aim of government,. instead of the material ope of increased wealth. A scientific or rational Liberal policy in ust, therefore, seek to secure as its paramount a reduction in tlie .palpable-waste which is* goiitg 011 in many directions. “But although increase of national material wealth hi ust cease to be the State’s'main purpose, national wealth under the policy-indicated ‘will grow far Taster than when •wealth was the State’s cardinal object;- while..a/Wider distribution; and wiser consumption .will be assured. “Enormous waste is going o t in reduced vitality on the part of the great masses of the people owing to :bad housing conditions, overwork, insufficient nutritious food aud leisure,- and the enervating anxiety as to the means of. subsistence in tfie future. Every nation has as its highest form of wealth ,a certain volume of vital-. energy, ■and the progress of the nation in the /highest sense depends upon the .promotion, conservation, and rational application,pf this energy.’ -REMOVE THE BARS, OPEN THE WAY; Tlie-keyuote struck by : : Sir ' : John Findlay \vas..the. necessity for .freedom ofopportunity. “The guiding star of this freedom;” .he states, “ is equality : to give to eaeh-iuan and woman who has an equality of capacity an equality of chalice ; to remove, the. invidious bars. of birth, and open the way to energy and ability—or, to express it in -Napoleon’s phrase: ‘Lacarriere ouvsrt aux talents,, voila mon principe.’ This involvesasystem of the! State’s, providing tools for'/williug hands, which embraces State provision for:— (a) Land lor the settler without capital. (b) Capital for those who can efficiently and productively use.it. (c) Training by . way .of equipment,for.. profitable occupation.' (cl) Any other assistance which is reasonably necessary to enable the genuine and willing worker to best employ his energies; “As ancillary to these . objects provision must be made for the promotion of co-operation and mutual help organisations. ( In,.this connection, co-operative agricultural banks,; ou tlie welLesta.blislied Continental systems, should be uude possible, the aim of which would be in proper cases to,accept the .moral risk as.seciirity, .without, requiring as at present, .a-tangible security, thus enabling the man without capital but with good character,and qualifications, to obtain requisite financial assistauce. down with Exploitation. “ Effective protection must be given to the community against exploitation.by,monopolies. Where . regulations fail to achieve this end, State competition should be in-

voked; and where both fail, State monopoly should be unhesitatingly adopted.,.; “The/whole of these proposals proceed bn the assumption that the ambit out lie State’s activities must !. be greatly enlarged; and that the fundamental principle is the reasonable subordination ' of individual interests to the permanent welfare of the whole community. “ Liberalism so conceived has no j alliance with Socialism. Socialism seeks equality of conditions for the j peqple—which means in the long / run a dead level; while Liberalism j seeks equality of opportunity—/ which affords fair scope for superior industry, energy and intelligence. Returning, then,, to the princijile with whichwe started, the aim of a vitalised Liberalism must be—not, 7

as of old, the promotion of material wealth, but of the human personality and character of the p&ople as a whole.

“ But the success of a measure depends as much-upon the sincerity* and energy with which it is administered, as upon its inherent methods as a measure,. Some easygoing defaulters sign .a, bill or promissory note for a debt, and then' ‘ Thank God that’s paid ’—and there is a disposition in Parliament to regard an evil when it lias passed a bill for the purpose.

“No liberal policy,”, he declares, in conclusion, “ is any use unless it is courageously and vigorously administered: Faith, sincerity and determination, must animate the party that supports it, or it becomes a mere worthless policy on paper.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19181228.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 28 December 1918, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
962

LIBERAL PRINCIPLES. Hokitika Guardian, 28 December 1918, Page 4

LIBERAL PRINCIPLES. Hokitika Guardian, 28 December 1918, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert