Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Question of Privilege.

SIGNIFICANT SPEECHES BY TWO LABOUR MEMBERS. i poiiiL ui jmvnc&c wuo iuibeU uy -Vu' x'ayno lijnn; twiui lvguru to a copy oi a lot tor read by uiio Jueader ox fcae Opposition whicii alleged ma I tiKi member luiu been ' io vote lor tlio Uoveiiiiueiu by a gut oi JiiUu^. I'iie motion waa seconucu. by Mr VeiU'li, Labour member i'or wauyanui, and supported, unionist oUiuit, by Alt Robertson, nioiuuoi lor uiis doctorate, whoso speech appears in full in another column oi to-day's Chronicle. The utterances of these two gentlemen must prove exceptionally interesting in view of the pretsent position of parties in ihe House. Mr Robertson referred to himself as standing on the same platform as jMr Payne. Mr Payne has already expressed himself as prepared to support the Government on the Noconfidence motion now before the House; the only logical inference is that Mr Robertson is prepared to walk into the same lobby as his colleague. In this connection we feel impelled again to emphasise what we pointed out in our leading article of the 22nd inst., that Mr Robertson, by so voting, does not violate any of his election pledges. It is well-known to anyone who has followed closely the course of the recent election in this constituency that tho whole campaign was fought out on the clear-cut issue of "Ward or no Ward." This battle cry was raised specially strongly at the meeting of the joint committees of Monckton, Brown and Robertson, and at that gathering it was unanimously agreed that that and Mint alone should bo the question to be decided at the polling-booth. A'lie retirement of Sir Joseph Ward, therefore, has left the member for Otaki with an absolutely free hand as to voting for or against the G >vernment which is to be run apart from Sir Joseph. Mr Robertson's speech in the House last night, rend in conjunction with the resolution passed at the mass meeting of his nominators on Thursday last, should he a very good indication as to how ho will exercise his vote when the No-confidence motion is finally settled. It is difficult to see how any mat. standing in the interests of Labour could vote against n reconstructed Cabinet hacked oy tho amazingly democratic platform brought down inthe Governor's speech.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19120224.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Horowhenua Chronicle, 24 February 1912, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
384

Question of Privilege. Horowhenua Chronicle, 24 February 1912, Page 3

Question of Privilege. Horowhenua Chronicle, 24 February 1912, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert