Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"SAM," AND A CRITIC.

To the Uditor. Sir,—ln reply to critics re fair arid candid criticism: It was candid —very much so. For instance, he might with profit have extended his sympathy to the player instead of the* piano—the "soft pedal' is entirely "dut of action/' and urgently requires attention. His reference to Di'i Adrt.ms was also very harsh. Any person may (especially a doctor). w'ith the best intentions in the World, undertake to play a part and afterwards find himself so very busy that he cannot give it the amount ot attention requisite to ensure a. good interpretation. Possibly, then, the moistening or " smacking ' his lips might very easily have been attributed to 'its rightful cause, viz., knowing he was not inside his part, and consequently nervous and apprehensive. Brief reference to my .alleged preference for limelight: ■First—when I joined the club I stated, at the first meeting that T was not at all anxious to-play any "parts" ; willing to assist in any capacity. Secondly—V* lion jit the conclusion of the last performance the question was discussed of playing "Sam" in another locality. T then offered my ".part l ' to Mr Tilling, as -T wanted to curtail the long "waits" and could do < this -more effectually if not sustaining ahv character. Thirdly: Before the production of "Sam." the "parts'* were already allotted for a new "piece" with an entirely new cast of principals, thus showing we were trying to give satisfaction to all, if possible. "Pacts are chiels that winna. ding." and tlie.se are easily verified. Regarding his reference to "howling success," etc.: Possibly lie was horrified at such dreadful words! T can assure him I know perfectly well their equivalents, had I. cared to use them, but tihey just suited. As it happened, •he .is like one of our party who, when the request came from the "mill," stated, "we were not catering for mill hands." Perhaps not. but they paid their money, so T saw no reason why we should not accede to-their wishes; in fact, when the company is reconstructed it is a necessity that each intending member shall assume a "superiah" air and pronounce the word "haw " as frequently as possible. etc., FRANK MAY. Vogel street, Shannon.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19110130.2.16.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Horowhenua Chronicle, 30 January 1911, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

"SAM," AND A CRITIC. Horowhenua Chronicle, 30 January 1911, Page 3

"SAM," AND A CRITIC. Horowhenua Chronicle, 30 January 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert