WHOSE WAS THE WHALE ?
fI'KR rSIF?= Ajwrf.lTlQN T BLEXJIKIM, Jnn'-nry 10. The judgment -J the Chief .Tiustire (Sir R.ol*rt Stoui) was delivered today in the an-pra! against the Ma-ris. .trate's decision in re en.t, wh.-ilr case. Tt wil! be remembered that Te Awaite wlv>!-t- h,] kil'ed a, wha'e in Q<:c:?r Cl.e.r! it-; S:wnul. ■ which ■ :> 1 f r>i- knvj.w -towed to a pV. r. >■,[ >■■>.<•! v ~, days a f toiuai \ *' \ > | "by another put-, * ' > I 1 r sion. The "arc jiultc- - ment ror the '!V Awiiff* pnrt-v nr ! , Sir Boberfc upheld this civ- . : .that in Ins opinion "-whale was left in a pontmn of apparent .-..safety, and remained the pi-opprtv of the peisons v ho Kilh I if m ,i "it bad been a boat loft in that P"si- - tion. Costs uei e urantcl appellants.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19110111.2.18
Bibliographic details
Horowhenua Chronicle, 11 January 1911, Page 3
Word Count
132WHOSE WAS THE WHALE ? Horowhenua Chronicle, 11 January 1911, Page 3
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Log in