“DISARMAMENT? YES!”
BUT NOT ONE-SIDED.
BALDWIN’S REPLY TO DETRACTORS.
(Received 18, 12.0) London, Nov. 17. "Our opponents’ suggestion that we are insincere in our desire for general limitation of armaments is untrue. The suggestion that we are heading straight for war is ridiculous,” writes the Rt. Hon. Stanley Baldwin in support of the Parliamentary candidature of Lieut.Colonel Sir William Wayland in the Canterbury by-election. "The adoption of our naval economy programme at Geneva would have saved the nations concerned millions more than any other scheme advanced, but I have never been a party to one-sided disarmament nor would the electors agree to premature reductions prejudicing the security of the Empire.”—(A. and N.Z)
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19271118.2.45
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XVII, 18 November 1927, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
112“DISARMAMENT? YES!” Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XVII, 18 November 1927, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in