Correspondence.
[We do not in any way identify ourselves with tee opinions of correspondents,! SUTTON V. PAORA TOROTOBO. TO THE EDITOR OP THE HAWKE'S BAY TIMES. Sir, —In reply to the article in to-day's Herald, concerning the judgment delivered in the case of Sutton v. Paora Torotoro, that has already appeared in your columns, I beg to state (without entering into the merits of the case) that it is within the past twelve months that verbatim reports and Judges' notes were eagerly sought after by your contemporary and an evening journal, whose bitterness towards the Maori race, and Judge Rochfort in particular, lias so lately received additional impetus through those and orhpr channels, -vJueh are merely the "opinions" of their greatest enemies.—[ am, &c, M. E. Hayes. Napier, July 5, 1872.'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBT18720705.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 19, Issue 1367, 5 July 1872, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
131Correspondence. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 19, Issue 1367, 5 July 1872, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in