Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LATE REV. JOHN WHITELEY ON NEW ZEALAND AFFAIRS.

The late Rev. John Whiteley, of Taranaki, New Zealand, writing on the 30th Sept., gives U 8 (Watchman) a sad picture of the etate of affaus in that colony, where ho ha 9 for many years labored : During the thirty-five years I have been in New. Zealand I never felt so desponding as at the pn sent time. The war with the natives, which began more than eight years ago, is still going on ! To day a steamer has arrived from the southern part of this province, bringing the men who were wounded in the lust engagement, and the intelligence that the rebel natives are threatening the adjoining province. Wa" unanui settlement is in danger, the militia are called out, and the people are all in a sad state of alarm. On the East coast, too, things are in a very unsatisfactory Btate, and it is feared that the few colonial troops that were taken from thence to assist in quelling the rebellion here will have to hasten bapk to fight for their own hearths and homes -tlose of them, at.least, who have not fallen in the strife here. And in the meantime farming operations are suspended ; stagnation, poverty, and despondency prevail. The object of the rebel natives in the south is to clear that part of European settlers, doubtless intending when that is accomplished to try the'r hand he-e or elsewhero. The consequence is that hundreds of persons who would otherwise have been diligently employed in cultivating the lands of this neighborhood have left the place, and more are going. "What is the use of expending funds and time on farms which may soon again " be overrun by the rebels?" is the natural language of many, and they have gone elsewhere to seek a safer and a more profitable home. Of course cur numbers in this province are vastly reduced, and if the rebels come here or rise in this neighborhood, we are almost powerless to stand against them. Our friendly natives are puzzled and know not what to make of it. They saw a large army of soldiers sent here from Sydney, from Melbourne, from India, from England, from " all the woJd," to suppress? the rebellion, and that army was recalled beforo the work was half done, as they think, and they infer that they were so recalled either because they could not do the work, or because England found out that the work to be done was not " tika" (not right) : that is that the colonists had involved Great Britain in an unrighteous war; and their conclusions now are that we are left to ourselves, that the rebels will now take advantage of our deserted and unprotected state, that they will seek *' utu" (payment, revenge) for all the past, as we failed to conquer them'when we had ten thousand soldiers and all their big guns in the land, we have now no chance whatever. And, of course they consider what will become of them, and ask themselves the question, what is their wisest course. If they by fidelity to, us assist a failing caus?, how will they stand when we fall ? And they are confirmed in these viewand apprehensions by the fact that the few soldiers that remain here do not help "he settlers at all, but are just spending their time amongst us like gentlemen. And if our own pakeha soldiers do not help us, why should they be expected to do so ? Can we gainsay this reasoning of the Maori mind among our friendly natives? I confess I do not see how, and I fear if they were required by necessity to be put "to their test the would say, "Your own soldiers do not fight for you, why should we?" And then regarding our cause as having been deserted by our mother country because it was an unrighteous one, they next step would b.e to go over at once to the rebels, regarding might as right and right as safety, The Abyssinia*n Expedition furnishes them with a remarkable contrast in confirmation of the views stated above. In that country there were less than a hun 11 red Europeans in captivity: here there are many thousands of men, women, and children, as they think, at the mercy of the rebels, who can any day at their pleasure do as they have done before—shoot down, tomahawk, and carry off those who, in their daily avocations, dreamt not of a foe being near. To Abyssinia a mighty p,rmy of men, and horses, and elephants, Wittl »U its appliances, w m seat to rescue

the few ; from this country the army was taken away, leaving the many to their fate, which in many instances already has been a terrible one, as widows, fatherless children, and bereaved friends painfully testify. In Abyssinia the work was completed, the captives were released, the enemy was subdued, and the author of all the evil was slain; in New Zealand the case was the reverse—the army was withdrawn, the rebellion was not suporessed, the thousands were left to their fate, and the instigators of the mischief were left at large. In that country the few pakehas were only sojourners in captivity, but not expending their money in making a home for themselves and their children after them; while here the thousands who have left their English homes to come to New Zealand have spent their all in expensive, continuous, and laborou* efforts to fulfil God's original command to subdue the earth and possess it, and have again and again been driven from homes which they had made for themselves, and which they hoped would be their children's homes, and the homes of their children's children. Eor the Abyssinian Expedition the British nation laudably and cheerfully contributed some £6,000,000 without grumbling oreqniriug a sixpence in return from those for whoso sake this expensive expedition was undertaken, whereas the army was withdrawn from New Zealand before it had done its work ; a debt at £3,000,000 is thrown upon the colony as the expenses jf that army ; the country is burdened with that debt as with a heavy millstone •ibout its neck, and every inhabitant of the and is taxed with the additional liability over and above all other demands upon his strength and energy, of having (q provide for the interest of this debt of £3,000/00. And now let me ask—ls this Maori view of the war the correct one? Correct or not, it is the view by which the natives are influenced, and by which their conduct is regulated. When I think of the deliverance of the Abyssinian captives, and of the West Indian slaves at a cost of twenty millions, and when I talk of these things with >ur friendly natives I glory ill my nation md thank God that 1 belong to such a people ; but when I think of New Zealand [ am humbled indeed. Much, I know, has been said on the other sid« in opposition to the view given above a 3 being that of the friendly Maoris. It may be said that our New Zealand Parliament requested that the troops might be withdrawn. But why was s such a request made ? Several reasons may be mentioned It was insinuated that the war was begun or was being continued for the gratifying of the ambition and the avarice of the col. nists, and this insinuation being extensively entertained by the army the effect was manifest, in comparative inactivity. The colonists were given to understand the expenses of the war would fall upon them, and our Government rightly considered that the cxpensivenesa of such comparative inactivity should not be continued. The hope was entertained that the rebellious natives had been led to see thei ■ mistake, and that when the way was opened for their return to friendship by the removal of the soldier* from the country they would avail themsel es of that opportunity. It was like the layin r -dowu of arms on our part and an invitation for them to follow our example. As a colony we felt that we could not afford to pay for an expensive and comparatively inactive army, and we hoped to be able to do without it. And it may be said that the thousands of brave men in New Zealand who bear the British name ought to be able to cope with the few natives who ire in rebellion against us. True, but then, liow are they to cultivate their farms and keep the field against the foe at the same time? How are they to pay off the debt of three millions, or even the interest thereof, if their time and energi -s are to be exhausted in an expensive and protracted warfare; the friendly natives never approved of the withdrawal of the troops until matters should be throughly settled, and it is now with them a very serious question, what will be done, and how will they be affected? Some three or four months ago the frendly natives of this district visited the rebel tribes in the south with the hope of promoting and establishing peace. This gave those tribes an opportunity of returning the visit, and they came by hundreds. But they came, not as those who are vanquished and humbled but as those whose right it is to dictate terms and law. Of course they came with uut arms, and were received with every manifestation of friendly feeling, and hospitality, both by natives and Europeans. But to the appeal made to them by the authorities in the way of assertion and example, <' War is at an end, is it not?" and which was responded to in native fashion by a loud and unanimous "-4e" from the pakehas, they made a very equivocal and nnsatisfactory response, and since their return war has bee i recommenced in a most savage and murderous way by them or their friends. The impression is therefore irresistible they comu here for the purpose of spying out our weakness, and also of getting the friendly natives over to their side. Out of deference to those by whom they were entertained thoy allowed us to hold our religious services in their presence, and to preach to them the everlasting Gospel, but they took cire to lose no opportunity of exitioiting the fascinating ceremonies of their new religion of Hauhaiusm before the Christian natives, and of doing all they could to persuade them that it was all the same religion as their own, and vastly superior in their way of observing its ceremonies and worship. That they eucceded to a very large extent is unquestionable, and the declining interest manifested in our schools and worship is a painful proof that the friendly 1

natives are sympathising to a serious degree with those who are in rebellion against us. The successes which the rebels have achieved will of course further confirm these wavering "friendlies" in their faith in the cause of those who have taken up arms against us, so that it may before long become with them a settled conviction that we are all wrong, and they are bound by duty and by interest to abandon us. And what have we in the whole length and breadth of our province to rely upon in the event of a general or evc\n a local manifestation of disaffection ? Truly the "nakedness of the land" might tempt our friends to despise and forsake us, and our foes to "swallow us up." When I visit the settlements of pur enterprising English families, it is painful to think how very easily might all the effects of their industry be destroyed, and themselves, husbands, wives, children, all tomahawked and devoured, without anyone being the wiser till all was over. And these are the men who have to pay the war debt of three millions ! O Britain | how canst thou bo so 7 forgetful of thy far-off children ? But the Lord reigneth. Let this thought check mf complaints, and rebuke my Better than my boding fears To me thou oft bast proved.

Thank God, we have some "righteous persons" even in New Zealand, and the Lord will hear their prayers. Our Government, our colonists, I know, are wishful, earnestly, ardently wishful to save and elevate the native race. May God have mercy on these infatuated rebellious tribes their eyes, and turn them from darknes* to light, from the power of Satan unto God ?" It lias been said, "The natives are fighting for their lands.' But " the earth is the Lord's," and for 600 years he has been waiting for them to occupv." GuO years more would find them with millions upon millions of still unoccupied acres: and Providence indicates that now shall this portion of his earth be occupied by those who are able and willing to bring forth the fruits thereof. Let our brave colonists then, have the sympathies of the nation with them her. 1 , and which is well able to sustain and heln them.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBT18690315.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 13, Issue 664, 15 March 1869, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
2,181

THE LATE REV. JOHN WHITELEY ON NEW ZEALAND AFFAIRS. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 13, Issue 664, 15 March 1869, Page 4

THE LATE REV. JOHN WHITELEY ON NEW ZEALAND AFFAIRS. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 13, Issue 664, 15 March 1869, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert