Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

John Buchanan appeared to answer a charge, that he did on Wednesday the 28th. of June 1865, say to one Edward Spencer Curling, certain words, with intent to provoke the said Edward Spencer' Cualing to fight a duel with the said John.,Buchauan. The, Court expressed a wish that a compromise might be made. Mr Curling said that he did not speak the words that were the origin of the matter to Mr Buchanan. Mr Buchanan said that he had heard them, they could not be divested of a political aspectbeing almost apart of Council proceedings. The compromise not being effectad, the case wns allowed to proceed. E. S Curling said that on the evening in .questinu he in speaking to Mr Colenso of a recent public meeting, had used the word disgraceful, and had refused to explain his meaning to Mr Buchanan, wherupon that gentleman had challenged him to fight, using amongst other offensive words those of officer, militia, and pistols. Mr C’s statement was* (Oerr borated by Mr Tiffen, hy Capt. Carter except as to the word .pistols, by Mr Richardson and Mr Dolbel except as to the words, Officer and pistols.

Eor the defence, Mr Buchanan called Mr ■Colenso-who said he considered the fault to bo on Mr Curlings side, and that Mr B. had nojiutention of fighting, Mr B. did not use either of .the words, pistols, militia, or officer, Mr C’s statement was corroborated by Mr Stuart, and by Mr Edwards, each of whom must have heard the words, if they had been used, and who believed that the affair was hut a noisy altercation without any intention of provoking to fight. The Court Laving r. tired for twenty minutes, did not think the charge sustained, nor that any jury would i&nd -s verdict for the pluintitf,Hhe.case was consequently dismissed, Very great interest was taken in the case by the public, and the announcement was the signal for loud cheering.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBT18650703.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 6, Issue 2, 3 July 1865, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
327

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 6, Issue 2, 3 July 1865, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume 6, Issue 2, 3 July 1865, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert