Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ARGUS PRIVILEGE CASE.

The case of Mr. Dill was again the subject of a lengthened clicussion in the Legislative Assembly last night, the question beingwhethev (as moved by Mr. Hood) the prisoner be liberated on payment of the fees, or whether the debate should be adjourned till this evening (as proposed by Mr. llcales). The amendment was based on the ground that members of the Assembly had not had time, since the judgment of the Court had been announced, to acquaint themselves with precedents from the journals of the House ©f Commons, that the liberation of the prisoner might be preceded by, and conducted on, such forms as might l?cst maintain the dignity of the Assembly, after the manner followed by the Commons Petitions for freedom emanate from the prisoner—apologies for supposed libels to be made by him at the bar —'reprimands to be administered by the Speaker to Mr. Dill for his contumacy —were freely suggested by some honorable members,. including the Attorney-General (who spoke with considerable heat and personal feeling), by Dr. Evans (who professed with the utmost coolness and power of face a total recantation of the opinions he expressed in the House on “privilege” in 1556-7), by the oldest and most modest of the representatives of Ararat (Mr. M‘ Lellan) and ethers. The amendment was ultimately agreed to by thirty-four to fourteen, and therefore, a further display of the eloquence of our Lower Chamber may be expected on this novel, and to them dainty, subject. Last night, therefore, the publisher of this journal again remained the padlocked prisoner of the Legislative Assembly, pending the will of the members who vote for his detention in custody.-- -Argus, May 21. Release or Mr. Dili. Last night, the Legislative Assembly disposed, for the time of their prisoner, Mr. Dill. On the motion of Mr. Frazer, and without discussion, the 11 •'.use decided to discharge Mr. Dill from custody, on the pavmcnf of the fees incurred. --Ann's; Miv il.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBT18620626.2.14.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hawke's Bay Times, Volume II, Issue 52, 26 June 1862, Page 6 (Supplement)

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

THE ARGUS PRIVILEGE CASE. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume II, Issue 52, 26 June 1862, Page 6 (Supplement)

THE ARGUS PRIVILEGE CASE. Hawke's Bay Times, Volume II, Issue 52, 26 June 1862, Page 6 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert