SUPREME COURT

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 23, 20 October 1937, Page 6

SUPREME COURT

Three Criminal Trials on Napier List SESSION NEXT WEEK Three criminal trials are set dowa for hearing at th© October session of the Supreme Court in aiNapier nex/fe week, before Mr Justice Ostler. In addition one accused will appear for sentence. Tkere is also a number of civll cases, including several claim3 for damagoO arising out of motor accidents and S number of divorce applications, Tho lipt is as follows: — CRIMINAL TRIALS Rex v. Gorald James (Mr HaTker)| alleged reckless driving causing death. Rex v. John William McClure j alleged escaping from lawful cnstody, alleged breaking, entering and theft. Rex v. William James Hyde (Mf " Averill); alleged failing to keep proper books of-accounts, alieged "contract- ' ing debts without expectation of payi ing. FOR SENTENCE .Rex v. John William McClure, break-) ' ing, entering and theft (two charges)* CIVIL CASES • Judge and Jury of Four. , • r . Riehard Joseph Burke v. James Col*« man. Claim for £139 11/6 special dam- ' ■ ages and £500 general damages for im juries received in motor collisiom Counter-claim for £159 12/4 special and £25 general damages. Peter John O'Regan v James Colei man. Claim for £36 13/- special dann ages, and £100 general damages for im juries received in motor collision. , Before Judge and Jury of 12. { '

The Tourist Motor Co. Ltd. v. Cedri# Kirkley. Claim for - £571 - 1/3 for goodi and services rendered. f Frederick Henry Gradwell V Mattbeif Ferrick. Claim for £14o special flanfc* ages and £500 general damages for im juries received in jnotor collision. John 'Smiley y. Donald Keighley^ Claim for £696 15/- special damage^ and £2500 general damages for injuriea received in motor collision. Thomas Clifford y. Hilda L A. Somer* vell. Claim for £525 2/10 special • damages for injuries received !n collft 3ion between cycle and motor-car.. Before Judge Alone. Muriel C. T. Brown y. Hubert F. Nunn. Claim for return of goods and chattela, £50 damages for detention and £501 damages in case posseesion cannot be had. Jessie S. O'Dowd v. A. L. Thompson and others, and N, A. Jensen and others. Claim that Court shall prm nounce for will in solemn form of law; | (will destroyed in fire following earth- : quake). ' : Herbert Edward Coddington y. Eds mund Arthur Bourgeois. Claim for-dim ; solution of paTtnership, accounts, etc. H. M. Johnston and another v. Ra! Lawson and another. Claim for order, for partition of lands or sale of landt and distribution of proceeds. IN DIVORCE, Mary M. Carpendale r. Robert H* Carpendale. petition. for divorce on grounds of separation. Lily V. Tanner v. John Alfred Tam ner. Petition for divorce on ground of' separation. . . Arthur H. J. Gudsell v. Josephine M. Gudsell. Petition for divorce on ground of separation. Marjorie Daphne Austin v. William Austin. Motion for decree absolutt and custody. Andrew J. J. Peters v. Elsie I* Peters. Motion for decree absolute, custody and maintenance. 1 ... John Briscoe v. Elsie M. L. Briscoo. Motion for decree absolute. Edwin F. Fischer v. Ellen L. Fischeri Motion for decree absolute. ' i Vera Mary Head' v. Sydney Francio Head. Motion for decree absolute and permanent maintenance. Henry Charles Robjohns .v. Dorothy E. Robjohns. Motion for permanent alimony and order setting aside deed of marriage settlement. Robert .James Managh v. Rubina. L M. Managh. Petition to discharge or vary order for permanent maintenance, MISCELLANEOUS. ' "The Companies Aet,.193§": Thn Fruit Traders Ltd. (in liquidation), summons for leave to make a call. 1 ' The Magistrate 's Court Act, 1928": Henry Lionel HaTker v. Charles J. P. Drewitt. -Appeal on point of law and matter of f act against decision .of Magistrate sitting at Wairoa. "The Family Protection Act, 1908": William Hugh McCan v. Cecilia M.McCann and another. Originating summons for provision out of estate. IN BANKRUPTCY. William Matthews. — Motion for. dis- „ charge.