Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DELEGATE FRANKLY CRITICISES PROCEDURE AT N.C.W. CONFERENCE

Our Own Correspoudent.)

(From

PALMERSTON N., Last Night. Giving a report before an open meeting of members of afliliated societies yesterday on the recent Dominion conference of the National Council of Women Mrs Duncan Simpson was frankly critical of proeeedings. At the outset or a most comprehensive report, Mrs. Simpson said her most vivid impression had been of the manner in which Miss Kirk had presided over the deliberations. There they were, Mrs Simpson said, a heterogeneous gathering of women all more or less wanting to express their opinions, in the midst of whom Miss Kirk had sat oalm and sineere, maintaining infinite patience. She had given a marvelloua example of control. There had been many clever speakers, Miw, Simpson continued, but tho debates had been too long, going round and round the points very often and in the end getting nowhere. Mrs. Simpson questioned the method of branch voting, expressing the opinion that de^egates should be given more freedom to use their own discretion after big questions had been fully discussed. She had found herself somewhat unique in being truitted to vote according to her conscience after hearing points thrashed out. Another anomaly on the question of voting, she thought, was that on the Dominion executive only presidents of branches could vote. Although tho speaker had deputised for tbe Manawatu president and was herself a vicepresident she had not been allowed to vote at- the Dominion executive moeting. There had been several others in a i similar position. While there had been mucfi that was vitally intoresting, Mrs. Simpson said, quite frankly she had been disappointed, whereas the conference might have been wonderful. It' did not seem to be a National Council of Women and under the present method, although in the branches there was representation of all organisations it was quite possible at conference some of the largest organisations would not be represented. . In fact, one of the largest women 's organisation — the Women 's Institutes — had not been represented and she had; frequently found it necessary to present the Countrywomen's point of view for both organisations. When it was realised what enormous distances the delegates had travelled from all over New Zealand it was a pity they had not got more out of it. She felt very strongly when there were such important mattcrs to discuss, that exeursions and social engagements conld have waited until the work was done. A number of remits could not b.e consider- ■ ed and would now have to be sent back to the branches and a postal vote taken in six months' time. It waB quite obvious the remits should be limited as in England where they would perhaps have only six. Finally Mrs. Simpson urged tho branch to send a good representation to the next conference and not leave it to a single delegate to be a voiee crying in the wilderness, as she had very oftea found herself.

"What constitutes really good tobaeco?" asked "Calabasli" in a London weekly, and proceeded to answer his own question thus: "Good tobaceo must possess unexceptionable flavour and bouquetj its nicotine content should be negligible; it should be cool and sweet, and it should, moreover be possible to smoke it for liours at a stretch without the smoker experieneing satiety, a burnt tongue or irritated throat; even free indulgence should leave no injurious after effects. " In the following issue of the paper several lettejs appeared from readers anxious to know where tobacco of such merit as that described by "Cala-j bash" could be procured. He had to confess he couldn't tell them. Tobacco1like that is not obtainable in England.; In New Zealand it's to be had at any tobaccouist's shop. All you've got to do is to ask for our own "toasled'1 which conibines all the points specified by ".-Oalabash " aud is free froin nico- • (ine as tobacco can be. The five (and only genuiue) toasted brands are: Cut Plug No. 10 (Bullshead), Navy Cut No. 3 (Bulldog), Cavendish, Riverhead ! Gold and Desert Gold.*

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19371020.2.102.1

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 23, 20 October 1937, Page 11

Word Count
677

DELEGATE FRANKLY CRITICISES PROCEDURE AT N.C.W. CONFERENCE Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 23, 20 October 1937, Page 11

DELEGATE FRANKLY CRITICISES PROCEDURE AT N.C.W. CONFERENCE Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 23, 20 October 1937, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert