Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN OFFENSIVE APOLOGY

g f H. R.

FRENGH*

Sir, — It is more than poeaible that* had General Gough realised that the beiated apology made to him by Mr Lloyd George would have been tele« graphed round the world as another accusation againat Field-Marshal Haig, he would not have failed to defend his former C-in-C. He may have done so, but the news-agency has not told us. The debate between Haig and Lloyd George as to whether the Great War could have ended sooner by operations in minor theatres, or whether, as Haig strongly held, the issue would be .de- • ci.ded on the western front will continue to be discussed. But the evidence now. open for all to read is that Haig's prevision of what did happen ih March 1918 was right, and that Mr Lloyd George failed to take the desperate action neeessary to supply the reserves Haig demanded in order to withstand the final German attaek. That attack was meant to be overwhelming and came dangerously near to success. Haig expected'the blow to fall on the Fifth Army, yet he moved his meagre x& serves nearer to the coast because, hro the blow f allen there, aid would have been too slow in reaching the point' of peril. Mr Duff Cooper's ' ' Haig" in two volumes is in our Public Iibrary. Those who read those volumes and others will feel that Mr Lloyd George is .virtually; admitting to General Gough that he was unjustly saerificed by the then Prime Minister, who was David Lloyd George, is not fair .to Haig in again blaming him when ha constantly failed to ap-> preciate the sound judgment pf the British C-in-G and in this. particular: crisis failed to act with his usuai energy in answering Haig's plea for every man possible before. .the great blow was struck, The Germans present at Gough 'a rehabilitation would not .praise Gough by blaming Haig. Had Haig's counsel been accepted at the Armistice, and the Peace Conference, Europe might have won jto sanity ere this. — Youra. ete..

Hastings, March 23, 1937,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19370323.2.96.1

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 57, 23 March 1937, Page 6

Word Count
344

AN OFFENSIVE APOLOGY Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 57, 23 March 1937, Page 6

AN OFFENSIVE APOLOGY Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 57, 23 March 1937, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert