Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SMITH ACQUITTED

Charge of Theft of Rugs and Cloihing Fails ECHO OF QUAKE PERIOD A verdict of not guilty after 30 minntes' deliberation was returned in the Supreme Court at Napier this morning by the jury empanelled to decide the case of Thomas Smith, a labourer, of Napier, who was charged with stealing three rugs and a quantity of clothing and other articles valued at £13, the property of David Avery Cormack. The Crown alleged that the artieles were taken from Cormack's tent on Nelson Park, Napier, Jin Septem&er, 1932, when the community was still in disorder following the earthquake diBaster. Mr H. B. Lusk conducted the case for the Grown. Smith, who pleaded not guilty, was represented by Mr C. G. Harker. The following jury was empanelled. — Messrs F. J. Annan (foreman), J. Archer, H. G. Etheridge, C. E. Wrighton, G. O. Bartlett, J. G. Ewan, E. H. Bomface, J. Walsh, R. Cox, G. Hansen, S. G, Thornton, R. H. Wilson. Outlining the facte of the Grown's case, Mr Lusk said that on Sep'tember 29, 1932, the results of the earthquake were still in evidence, and a number of Napier residents, including a Mr and Mrs Cormack, were living under canvas. At a recent date some articles, including the rugs, haff been found at the accused's house and identified as the property of Mr and Mrs Cormack. Moreover, it eould be established that th« articles had been in Mr and Mrs Cormack's tent on Nelson Park on September 29, 1932, when it was ransacked. Mr Lusk then called witnesses whose evidence was along the lines of that given at the lower Court hearing. Mr Harker, who called no witnesses for the defence, submitted that, after a lapse of four .years from the time Cormack's rugs were missing until the time some rugs were found in Smith 's possession, the Crown had not definitely efctablished that the rugs in question in fact rightly belonged to Cormack. Nor had it been proved that Smith came dishonestly by the rugs' and other articles found in his possession. Moreover, Smith had been confined to his home with an injury at the time of the alleged theft, and therefore could not have broken into Cormack's tent.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19370210.2.70

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 22, 10 February 1937, Page 6

Word Count
372

SMITH ACQUITTED Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 22, 10 February 1937, Page 6

SMITH ACQUITTED Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 22, 10 February 1937, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert