Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PROHIBITION DEBATE.

[To Tin: Ei'iTon.j Km, —Referring to the forthcoming ilehute between i>r Husking and myself I find that the subjects as advertised are not those agreed upon. On Tuesday the questions are—--Ist. is iirohibition in accordance with Bible teaching. 2nd. Does the Bible prohibit the ordinary use of intoxicants ? And on Wednesday—--Ist. Is there any national los-; from the liquor tratiic: if so. how much ? 2nd. Is prohibition justilied so far as it aticcls the liberty of the subject ? These are tlu> questions agreed upon, and I shall expect my friend to debate.' them. I may say I was very much surprised in reading your paper tonight to find that there was a considerable alteration in the subjects to be argued, which has been done without my consent. —Yours, Ac., J ". Sutton. Napier, October 10th, IN!J(j.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST18961012.2.18.2

Bibliographic details

Hastings Standard, Issue 143, 12 October 1896, Page 4

Word Count
138

THE PROHIBITION DEBATE. Hastings Standard, Issue 143, 12 October 1896, Page 4

THE PROHIBITION DEBATE. Hastings Standard, Issue 143, 12 October 1896, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert