Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Appeal Judges Criticise Payment of Dividends

Alteration of Placings is Upheld P.A. WELLINGTON, Nov. 16. The Racing Conference Appeal Judges, Messrs J. Macfarlane Laing, J. Graham and T. C. Lowry, to-day dismissed the appeal of F. J. Cassidy and L. E. Kerr-Taylor, owners of the horse Ostentatious, against the de--ci si on of the Auckland District Committee in upholding the appeal ol J M. Upfold, owner of The Fake, declaring that horse the winner of the Windsor Hack Hurdles, run at Avondale, on July 17, in which race Ostentatious and The Fake were placed first and second respectively by the judge. The judges found that I H Fake suffered grave, and sustained interference from Ostentatious which, in their opinion, must .have materially interfered with the winning chance of The Fake. The judges ordered that the appeal deposit of £2O be forfeited In a rider to their verdict, the judges stated that, although the deputy stipendiary steward and stewards of the club knew, or should have known that there was a complaint by the patrol steward which was to result in an inquiry being held, the result of which might possibly have affected the placings, authority was given, before the inquiry was held, for the payment of the dividends. The judges said that, in the public interest. they viewed this with gravity, and considered that the officials of racing clubs should exercise greater care when an inquiry might possibly result in an alteration of placings.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19481117.2.58

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 17 November 1948, Page 6

Word Count
244

Appeal Judges Criticise Payment of Dividends Grey River Argus, 17 November 1948, Page 6

Appeal Judges Criticise Payment of Dividends Grey River Argus, 17 November 1948, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert