Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Eire’s Neutrality in War Criticised by ex-U.S.A. State Secretary

LONDON, Nov. 9 In a book of memoirs of Mr Cordell Hull (who was American Secretary of State in war-time) published in London, he states that just before the invasion of Europe, the United States contemplated applying economicsanctions against Eire because Mr de Valera refused to expel the Axis diplomatic representatives from Dublin. He explains that the Americans dropped the idea of applying economic sanctions against Eire, largely at, the instance of Mr Churchill, who advised them "to let fear work its healthy process in Dublin,” and so prevent leakages of information about the forthcoming invasion of Europe. He says: "In 1942, when American troops landed in Northern Ireland, Mr de Valera immediately protested alleging that these troops intended to attack Eire. On this occasion,. President Roosevelt observed, ‘lf de Valera would only come out of the clouds and quit talking about a quarter of a million Irishmen ready to fight if they had weapons, we would all have a higher regard for him.’ In 1943, the United States tried in vain to persuade Mr de Valera to allow the Americans the use of Irish ports.” Mr Roosevelt wrote in a memorandum: “We are losing many American and British lives and many ships in carrying various supplies, to Ireland, without receiving anything in return, and without even so much as a ‘Thankyou.’ ” Mr Hull says that early in the war the United States at Mr de Valera’s request sent two food ships to Eire. Both were sunk by German submarines. Mr de Valera refused even to protest to Germany. Later, when Eire asked for further ships they were refused by the Americans. “I took the opportunity to point out.” | says Mr Hull, “the Ireland’s future security and safety depended inevitably upon Britain’s triumph, and that if the Irish Government thought, otherwise there could be no fruitful co-operation with the United States. 1 furthermore made it plain that tin-. United States would send Eire no surplus war material until that country was ready to show a more co-opera-tive attitude ”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19481112.2.46

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 12 November 1948, Page 6

Word Count
347

Eire’s Neutrality in War Criticised by ex-U.S.A. State Secretary Grey River Argus, 12 November 1948, Page 6

Eire’s Neutrality in War Criticised by ex-U.S.A. State Secretary Grey River Argus, 12 November 1948, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert