RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. AHAURA.
Saturday) September . 28. - (Before C. Whitefoord, Esq., R.M., and F. Guinness, Esq., J.P.) Lof tquist v. Maloney, — A claim of LlO, as damage for havoc done in the garden of the complainant at Napoleon Hill by the fowls of the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the fowls had destroyed seeds and young plants to the value of the ■ claim. The defence was that the fence round the garden was not fowl-proof, and that it was impossible to keep the birds from straying. Verdict for the defendant, with costs. - Staite and Devore v. D. Hayes>— A claim of Ll4 7s Bd, legal expenses' in his [bankruptcy. The defendant filed his schedule, and engaged Mr Staite, of the plaintiffs, as his solicitor. The defendant allowed the proceedings to lapse, and refused to pay even the actual expenses incurred in his behalf. Judgment for the plaintiffs, with costs. Taylor v. Reid.— A claim of L 66, for wages as an axeman at a sawmill. After the case was partly heard it was adjourned for the production of further evidence. * Jas. Byrne v.Ohas. Madden.— A claim of Ll3, for goods supplied at Duffe.
Creek. Judgment for the plaintiff, with ccsts.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18721005.2.12
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1306, 5 October 1872, Page 2
Word Count
200RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. AHAURA. Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1306, 5 October 1872, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in