Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

A sitting of the Supreme Court, in Banco, was held, at Hokitika on Friday, when the special case of Henry Low was argued. Low had been convicted at the District Court, Greymouth, of the larceny of gold, the common property of himself and mates, but the Judge, entertaining a doubt as to the conviction being good in law, a special case was reserved for the opinion of the Supreme Court. On Friday, Mr South, for the Crown, supported the conviction, and Mr Guinness against it. Judgment was reserved, The appeal case of Groom v. Mackley was then taken.' The case came from the Resident Magistrate's Court, Ahaura. The appellant Groom had been sued in that Court by the respondent Mackley for the value of a horse, alleged to have been lost by the negligence of Groom when the horse was in his charge or bailment. It was contended before the Magistrate that there was no evidence of negligence, and that, considering the nature of the bail- J ment, the appellant could not be held liable, except for gross negligence. The Magistrate, however, gave judgment for Mackley, for Ll7 10s, and L 3 7s costs. Against that judgment Groom appealed, and a case having been drawn up and signed by the Magistrate (Mr Whitefoord), the questions were raised thereupon — " Whether on the fasts disclosed there is any evidence of neglect ; whether the decision of the Resident Magistrate was right in holding appellant liable to return the goods at all hazards ; and whether the judgment was right ?" ; Mr Staite argued in support pf the appeal, and Mr Guinness supported the decision of the Court below. Judgment was reserved. The Court was adjourned until Tuesday next, at nine o'clock, when the application of Edward Smethurst will be heard for an order declaring the, deed of arrangement, between himself and his creditora duly executed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18720325.2.10

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1141, 25 March 1872, Page 2

Word Count
312

SUPREME COURT. Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1141, 25 March 1872, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1141, 25 March 1872, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert