Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

At the Supreme Court, Adelaide, last week; one of the jurymen empannelled refused to take the oath. The Judge's associate promptly commenced the affirmation usually administered in snoh cases, but on getting to the words, "is according to my religious belief unlawful," was again stopped, the r objector stating that' he didihpt: decline, on ithe .ground of "religious belief," but that "he did not believe-in an oath." His Honor and the/ officials were evidently nonplussed ! -*at this novel objection, and there seemed no way of the difficulty. After some time, however, the learned counsel suggested -that he would challenge the juryman, which was accordingly done, and he left the bo*. , :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18711206.2.10

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1049, 6 December 1871, Page 2

Word Count
110

Untitled Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1049, 6 December 1871, Page 2

Untitled Grey River Argus, Volume XII, Issue 1049, 6 December 1871, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert