Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PEGGING OUT AT GULGONG.

The:scene that was witnessed recently on the; Happy Valley lead— when the holders' of the claim No. 9 North on that lead, blocked off in accordance* with the regulations — after the red flag had been hoisted — was one of those extraordinary ebulUtionspf human nature tha^cju^only 'be'seen 6n*the gold fielals^aridwfeir only when a> gold field istworke^npder the abominable code of regulations now in force governing the. occupation-of irontace claims. Under these regulations it is held by justices who are presumed to know the meaning of them— seeing that they are invested with a finjil jurisdiction in hearing mining disputes arising under them— that any person occupying a frontage claim holds absolute occupation of the whole area of that claim until they have "blocked off" on finding rntyable gold and, all previous markings §c tinlawful. Whether this view is the correct legal meaning of the regulations — read one with the other— we will not now discuss, but we will simply point out the grave difficulties that arise in carrying this interpretation of the law into practical effect, and use the scene at the claim previously mentioned as au illustration. On that claim np less than one hundred and sixteen men claimed one block claim of four men^s ground adjoining the frontage block chosen. Atone corner of the block claim in dispute, twenty-nine boundary pegs had been put in the ground, . every one of which, pegs-repre-sented four men. Each party claimed to have their pegs in first, and .consequently they alone ' .were ' entitled :to - the . pjaim. As each of the; tiventy^m^.^jartjttte of owiTeri'were^prepaf^drto assert most positively their priority of right, it was of courseutterlyabsurdJor the Commissioner to attempt toHear evidence on that point. He therefore -pursued the simple but somewhat t irregular^ of allowing the whole of the disputants to. have a "shake in the hat" for the prize, and as might be expected from such a primitive mode of creating a title, the losers were loud in their complaints of the injustice done them, as it so happened in this "Game 'Of chance" that those who- had shepherded .the, holders of ■ the. enviable frontage claim day and night, for nearly a week, lost the reward of their sleepless vigilance, the prize falling to men who had shepherded for an hour. '- i '- >

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18710921.2.12

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 984, 21 September 1871, Page 2

Word Count
383

PEGGING OUT AT GULGONG. Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 984, 21 September 1871, Page 2

PEGGING OUT AT GULGONG. Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 984, 21 September 1871, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert