Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDENS' COURT,

Wednesday, September fc' I(Before Caleb Whitefodrd,_ Esq., 8.M.) John Marshall v. jiataes Mjsoy'.-^-A complaint that defendant) hid taken illegal possession of complainants' business section at No Town, and also a claim for L2O as special damages. This was 3 dispute between two storekeepers- at "Tib Town, The complainant claimed the section in dispute by virtue of occupation, He claimed 33x66ft under the old regulations. The premises of the disputanta are situated near the corner of two itreeis running atVight angles with each other, and the back premises, overlapped, 'Tie defendant also based his I right' tb the ground on priority of occupation. It was ■ not_ disputed that he was carrying ; bn business and occupied a section before Mr Marshall came to No Town, and he glajmed §3ft x 99ft under the new JiegUr lations. The complainant claimed that when he marked out his section the defendant had no peg* in the ground, and in a. "dispute^.with another person since, defendant) claimed his ground in an entirely diJFetr ent direction. A great dear of evideni^ wasteken, and the Warden reserved ms decision until he visited the ground in company with the Government Surveyor. Costs to abide the result. . ; . Stewart Monteith and party applied for permission to cut a head-race from 'tne head of the left-hand branch of No Town Creek. The application was Opposed by John Quinlivan and twelve others, because it would deprive the parties working in the bed of the creek of their supply of water. Granted, provided tb^^wq heads of wjjterwqi^lft^w^bia^wedtfl sun the creek, and sufficient water should be at all times left to fill the: dafcil at present registered. Several other applications were heard, and the Court adjourned to September 20(,h. • .- - - ■-*:'■■>'*

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18710911.2.14

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 975, 11 September 1871, Page 2

Word Count
286

WARDENS' COURT, Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 975, 11 September 1871, Page 2

WARDENS' COURT, Grey River Argus, Volume XI, Issue 975, 11 September 1871, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert