Lord Lyttelton has endeavored to give form and shape to the vague idea that " more BiBhop" would be good for the Church of England. He proposed to enable the Ecclesiastical Commissioners to frame schemes for new Sees to be sanctioned by the Queen in Council. Each new bishop was to rise in his turn to the House of Lords, and to recieve L 2500 a year, obtained by voluntary contributions. The Peers did not like the notion of " subscription bishops," and the bench generally rather snubbed the Bill, perhaps under the notion that if cheap bishoprics succeeded, all bishoprics might be cheapened. Lord Granville, in his gentlest manner, offered wliat'he called a " practical suggestion" to Lord Lyttelton, which was, to talk it over with the Bench and himself before he took a division ; but L"rd Lyttelton held on, and was beaten by 43 to 20. Cornwall does want a bishop, .and London a coadjutor, but an indefinite quantity of bishop would never do. No faith could survive fifty or sixty pastorals a year,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18690803.2.16
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume VIII, Issue 553, 3 August 1869, Page 4
Word Count
173Untitled Grey River Argus, Volume VIII, Issue 553, 3 August 1869, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.