A CORRECTION.
( To the Editor of the Grey River Argus.) Sir — I observe a slight inaccurracy in your report of the evidence given by me at the District Court on Wednesday, in the case of Roff and Fellows v. Kilgour. I did not say that " it did not appear to him (me) that Johnston had done all be should to instruct the contractors how to proceed with the work." 1 did say that in my opinion " they should have been furnished with a section of the bridge and specifications to go by ;'* but I did not say who should have furnished them, and MrJohnston informs me that it was not bia business to do so. — I am, &c., W. M. Cooper. Survey offic9, Greymouth, July 24, 1869.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18690727.2.14
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume VIII, Issue 550, 27 July 1869, Page 2
Word Count
127A CORRECTION. Grey River Argus, Volume VIII, Issue 550, 27 July 1869, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in