WARDEN'S COURT.
OjjJKcrieN to Extended Claim..— Heardy and party lodged an objection against £in ex- | tended claim being gi-anted to Heskett and party, at the Saltv/afcor, 6:1 th.3 ground of priority of right.; 'it.ovas* provedi hoy.ever, that the defendants- had thuds -th'o'prior-ap-plication,-.- and the W&deii disallowed -the objection witk costs. 1 - ' : ' DiSFDTED Site.— Wick# v.Deiary. -The plaiiitiiT- charged the defeii|ant'with illegally interfering with the plauriiif's building bu ■Section; •" 182, Arney street. The facts, as elicited; were that the' defendant had a few days ago taken up a bilsiness section on the^Peninsula, opposite Arney street ; but had placed his building on the street line. He was absent from the ground from Saturday to'- Wednesday,, and in the meantijno the plaihtiflf, muling thegrbuiul unoccupied, took possession, and "registerfid the section. The defendant strongly asserad' his light to the ground; but the Warden niled that -the plaintiff was legally entitled ' to it.- i&vTyler,- for the defendant, praised the point that the plaintiff had liotriSoinplied with the letter of ths Act, heYhayiug iulopted the >Siir-veyors'-pegs instead of placing (town pegs of his'bwu. Hotieo of intention, to appeal was given; but tho defendant •■ subsequently abandoned the sutt, and 'agreed to take anotlier section.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18660802.2.12
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Issue 87, 2 August 1866, Page 3
Word Count
198WARDEN'S COURT. Grey River Argus, Issue 87, 2 August 1866, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.