RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURTS.

Grey River Argus, Issue 64, 9 June 1866, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURTS.

gBEYMOUTBT, T^trsday, Juse % Mjo'(Sefore W, H.'Revell, Esq., Wa F aln«P iaigepieceofbaef produced; which answered the description of a. piece which had been jtoleufrointheEurope^nHotel. TheprisoS was arrested on another charge. Whence constable entered the tent the' p* jsS?± asleep, yjndex; the influence of BfcTS ' cook, of .the^European Hotel idenfi&d t £e ~ Wn P Ti UC^ M - a -P° rti^ pf thatwhich had been stolen from the, outside of hw kitchen "v Friday evening! last.- George Weber Si I*! had dehver^ at the European ote on Friday, .and .the slaughterman who lied the beast identified it (by the manner .which the tail was cut from theiS of |ccc which he had supplied to thebSeV " * prisoner .denied a)l knowledge of She *. He said he sept in the^WadiL 4^ W?y. n * and on Monday gpgteliadtwo or three nobblers. He inJt* M^i H much f ll^ to .be knockthisV 6 ™ c streets, and' seeing the door of ten! °W\ he went in and foU asleep, The Jone¥ n S ed t0 a man named,. William x °3thM «f ♦*& Little -^ apd si h f ». th at;. the case was' proven imprisin rt . -1 P nson er to. one months' gaol. I 1 Wlth iar d labor, in Holiitika !• The 4 '.■-. ' ■ -» ■"'''■••■■■ ■■■"■ the infolp o ?er was further-charged, on ing a caslr ot . "«jtnck Slpau, with ste/jl from a 'C nd 7, and a case of sarsaparilla M'llroy 1 .,- Alberfc street. Constable tent on tl** . at on searching prisoner's produced; "il"^., he Ipund .t^e'bQarils of brandy aW*?9 evidently tfie remains some of the *pan*la cases. They^bore ihc general Ij™ 1 brands, aiicj answered were stolen frw 10n °^ the cases whicii It was stated BH^y of Patrick Sloan, night of the 30» I^ k Sloan that on the .on his dray, buY" c had a load of goods the Lagoon he kffCouJd not then cross but watcliedvit uV^ay in Albert street, were th.en in his « yen o'clock: There a case of brandy, a^ gallons pf biandy^ boxes of paiukilletf saraaparilla, two In the morning hel^alf-a-chest of tea. were stolen. He cftthat all thegood's but he believed the \fc swear to them, duced to be portionaV of the cases pro' from his dray. The Yfhat were talcen which bore the bondeab- e brandy case, found. The. MagisfraV could not be? tion of the property wthe identifica- • atthough there was vkomplete,- and boards produced were jb doi^bt thq property, he would giwf the stolen benefit of the dpubt, andwrisoner the James Oldham was ch»he case, a coat from the dweUiuKi stealing Caldwell, but on the apSpf James* spector James, he was ?e^j»f Mr Lifor the jiroduction of theii'elpne d ay,^^^,.?> CIYILCASES.If ne?seß : Jp<fY J. Thompson v. Andrew* . ,.../.. i;?^^ 1^ 12s, for piles supplied. TliAiim Q| into Court ss, and disputed||k paid - -^k piles said to have beei\ suppw of .Jj|3 ; hearing the evidence, the mSFter .^^^& judgment for the amount cLaimetßye.^«<|W||B : James Johnston v. W. C $>xy£W IM d£4 11s Bd, for. one barrel of pork, m *M pound. The defendant admitted .Mi / 1 ceived the poritj but said the pa -/. m upon was 9d per, |)ound, and ha / 'I set off to the amount of £6 7s 6m I I missions, storage, &c.~, on goods aY / M sold by auction on plaintiff's acjß I /Mm case was rather a lengthy one, m I MM of details of no public intereaff / MM the various items in dispute, vM I MMI As to the set off, the defen« / MMt several sums of £1 each for suW / MMM for sale after they were bough m-* I tmMM price, and also 2£ per cent cona / /^^H same. He had sent in his ac« / f.^^| vertising and bell-ringing," •. / frWmm settled shortly after the sala I § WMM referred, and the plaintiff- m I | JMMM that his, arrangement w^^Bl ] lal^mmmi that as he was just s ta^Hß^n&>//j^^|^^H would not charge the S^R| . sion on his sales whenJj^jj^S in, but simply the 9lHB| (' Xiocket. The defend^^^Hm \ made such an arrang^^B^^H . *' j cide the question of t^S^Bßffi "T^l for commission, the M^HH| ' ■' \WM D. Maclean, and af^nH^H / ImM the Magistrate sa id :^^HH| JJ^mi oath against the °a||ljH|lf W^mmi agreement that ?P^aHn| t% "^BH charged unless the I'&a^ttttßgQ was inclined to tlp^|^H^ ' such agreement w^Bß|B|^ fendant's occountstJwJMMMwi paid, in which h^fflHffljp t^^H liminary expenses.' '||||GjlpU | !wMM commission, but;heifflg|^lc ' i^^H separate fees of £l^^^m^ IMH age, and he would"«^S^w charge the pork aj;^^g|c|n MMM following casea :^*||pitj|'O '^^M Robert Skinner— L7""-lOs^ •Watts and Co.— l9s Cd,. 1 , M^ Rober^jam^m^Jel^^^^^^^^^ l^^e^laintoSsTio^onippearin^B ing cases, and they were dismisscJE ' Johnston v. John Harris, GeorgeSF Henry Grumage. M [ Dismissed for ncn-appcarance^L (party: — George Simmons. vrWilliaß| Isaac Blake v. John Ellis ; Same fl James Johnston y. John Ellis ; MaM Comi(sky v. Daniel Buckley ; D. 8 and Co. v. the ni^stjer and owneß ketch Secret. ' '9