Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL.

[press association telegram.! WELLINGTON, December 6. At the Court of Appeal to-day before their Honors the Chief Justice and Mr Gillies, in the case of Connor v McKay, Dunedin, judgment was delivered, in which Mr Justice Williams concurred, affirming the decision of the Court below, and dismissing the present appeal with costs. In Connor v McKay (2), the order was varied and no costs of appeal were allowed. In Hurrey v Bank of New South Wales, Gisborne, judgment went for the plaintiff for the value of the goods, as found by the jury (<£Blo 6s 8d), each party to bear his own costs of the rule, and the costs of the action to bo apportioned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18821207.2.21

Bibliographic details

Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2704, 7 December 1882, Page 3

Word Count
118

COURT OF APPEAL. Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2704, 7 December 1882, Page 3

COURT OF APPEAL. Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2704, 7 December 1882, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert