Page 2 Advertisements Column 5

Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2647, 30 September 1882, Page 2

W. H 1 8 ’ IMPERIAL BOOT DEPOT, OASHEL STREET. For Kid Elastic-Side Boots of good quality, at 7s 6d, try the Imperial For Levant Elastic-bide Boots, good value, at 8s 6d, go to the Imperial For Kid Button Boots, at 9«, try the Imperial For Kid Lace Oxford Walking Shoos, at | 7», call at the Imperial For Kid Oxford Button Shoes, at 7a 6d, go to the Imperial For Children's Kid Lace Oxford Shoes, from 3a 6d, try the Imperial For French Lasting Boots, from 8s 6d, try the Imperial For Cheap Lawn Tennis Shoes, from 5s 6d, go to the Imperial For Canvas Boating Shoes, at 6s 6d, try the Imperial For the Largest Stock, the Best Quality, and the Lowest Price In all kinds of Colonialmade Boots, go to W. HARRIS, IMPERIAL BOOT DEPOT, Cashel street. 908

SUITS TO MEASURE FROM 70a. FIB ST CONSIGNMENT of SPRING TWISHES AND COATINGS Jnat Arrived. W. M. ROBERTS, Practical Tailor, Manchester street south. I Tronoers from 18a. Splendid Selection. __ 1002 FOR THE HOLIDAYS. jCey the cheapest shop in TOWN FOR | All kinds of Pipes, moerchaum and wood. Cigar and Cigarette Holders, Knives, Parses, Matchboxes, Razors, Combs, Brashes, Hair Oil, Lime Cream, & &o N.B.—A lot of CRICKS TING MATERIAL from last season very cheap. And last, but not least a HAIR CUTTING SALOON, Where yoa can gat fixed np for the small sum of STSZPEIS'CB--9195 H. OAKBY, High street

NOT QUITE SO DECISIVE AS IT WAS BUT A LITTLE MORE OVERWHELMING. WJQ CHALLENGE the representative of the Singer Sewing Machine Company, or any of the jurors on Sewing Machines at the Exhibition who voted for the report coming from that body to controvert the following statement of facts. Messrs Meddinga, Cunnlngton, Dale, and Elrk, we call upon yon to defend yoar report, H. C. PISKH k CO, Christchurch International Exhibition, { June 15th, 1882, REPORT OP COMMITTEE OP EXPERTS. |To H. O. Fiske & Co. TYEAR SIB, —In accordance with yonr JL 9 request, we have examined the New Davis and the New Singer Sewing Machines, for the purpose of comparing them. In our comparison we have takea Into consideration— 1. The mechanical principle involved 2. The quality of the material used 3. The degree of workmanship exhibited 4. The facility for doing a good and varied o'ass of work. After taking both machines asunder, carefully examining every piece, and fully testing their capabilities, we have no hesitation in saying that we consider the Davis far the superior machine of the two, Our reasons MiV CM full VS TT O i In both machines the same method is adopted for actuating the needle bar, viz., a crank with roller working in a cam. This earn in the Davis Machine is cut out of a solid piece of steel and hardened, while In the Singer it Is not only very much lighter, but is made of common oast iron.

The feed apparatus of the two machines are very dissimilar. That of the Singer Is the usual slip feed. The Davis has the vertical feed peculiar to itself. In this arrangement the presser foot holds the material firmly down till the needle has reached Its lowest point. The pressure la then relieved and transmitted to the feed bar. Feed bar, needle, and material are then, by a very simple oontrivauoe, moved forward simultaneously the required length of stitch

Motion is given to the shuttle in the Davis machine as follows. An eccentric at the wheel end of the main spindle gives motion to a vertical lever. This in tarn transmits it through a ball joint of ingenious construction to the only moving part under the machine, a pivotted lever having at its end an adjustable shuttle carrier. In the Singer Machine a pair of mitre wheels drive a vertical spindle, having at its lower end a crank, A connecting rod from this crank moves a sliding shuttle carrier. It will be seen that In the Davis there are between the main spindle and the shuttle four points of friction, the pivot carrying the vertical lover, the eccentric, the ball joint, and the pivot of horizontal lever. The two principal movements, the eccentric and the ball joint, are adjustable, and the parts most liable to wear are made of hardened steel. To compass the same work the Singer employs as points of friction the teeth of the mitre wheels, the two journals of vertical spindle, the two ends of the connecting rod, and the sliding shuttle carrier. None of these places are adjustable, The small wheels are common oast iron, having a certain amount of backlash, and consequent tendency to rattle and and break. The connecting rod la a thin bar of iron, with a hole In each end. The end which runs on the crank pin is one of the principal joints in the machine, having a considerable amount of work to do with small bearing surface, making it very liable to wear, while, as before remarked, there are no means of compensating for any wear, t It will be noticed that the shuttle of the Singer Machine 1s carried In a slide, to which a lateral strain is given by the driving rod, oanalng a certain amount of friction, while In the Davis It is curried by the lever quite free from friction. With the exception of the small roller working the needle bar, there is not a single piece In the Singer Machine, not even excepting the shuttle, that cannot be cat with sn ordinary pocket knife, and there are no means of adjusting any wearing part. In the Davis not only are most of the pieces made of steel, and tempered, but at every essential point means ere provided for taking up any wear. On this point we may say that where we had any donbt about the quality of the material employed the the piece wan broken and the fracture carefully examined. Having examined the mechanical arrangements of the two machines, we tested their adaptability for work, and wo qotloed the very peouliar feed of the Davis. In this respect wo have been forced to the conclusion that for all purposes, sawing from the thinnest muslin to even through a metal spoon, the Bavin has no parallel for grasp, or for avoiding that puckering often the effect of the pressure on a foro motion feed. We must In common honesty express our astonishment at the range and variety of work accomplished by the Davis, which we are satisfied cannot bo done by the Singer. In summarising our report we repeat that we have no hesitation in saying that we regard the Davis aa very superior to the Singer in workmanship, material, and the mechanical principles Involved, and also In performing a greater range of work. We found the Davis to work with equal ease from the lightest to the heaviest fabric, JOHN LEE SCOTT (Scott Bros.), Mechanical Engineer. T. GLTTYAS PASCOB, Manager of the Kaispol Clothing Factory, GEO. P. ANTHONY, Mechanical Expert, from Nettlefold’s, Birmingham. 8300