MAGISTERIAL.

Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2595, 1 August 1882, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL.

OHBISTOHUBOH Tuesday, Aughtst 1.

[Before J. Ollirier, Esq., J&M,, F. Guinness,

B*q.,"j.P]

Dbunkbnnbs3. —For a first offence a man was fined ss.

Illegally on Pbbmises.—lsaac Butterfield and Jane Gilchrist, who were found entering the unoccupied part of a house in Lincoln road, belonging to William Goldstein, at two o'clook this morning, were ordered to be imprisoned, each for fourteen days with hard labor. Maintenance. —An order formerly made against Joseph Lloyd for a contribution of 10s towards the maintenance of his wife Ollivia was cancelled, on the ground of his inability from poverty to pay that amount. A fresh order was made fixing the future contribution at 5s per week. Neglected Child. —Charlotte Donahoe, a tidy looking little girl, aged eight years, whose father is dead, and who has been deserted by her mother, was, on the application of her grandmother, ordered to be sent for a term of seven years to the Orphan Asylum of St. Mary and St. Miohel at Nelson, the polioe to forward her forthwith. Civil Cases.—Heslop v Clark, ckim JtZ 10a. This being a debt purchased from an insolvent estate, and the purchaser not being able to produce an assignment of it in his favor, he was nonsuited, with solicitor's (Mr Joyce) fee, £1 Is, costs of Court, and expenses of one witness, 6a. Tudball v McGee, claim £l7 16a 5£3, and MoGee v Tudball, olaim £2l 17a 7d. Mr Perceval appeared for Tudball and Mr McCannel for MaGee. The parties are butohers, and the cross claims arose cut of mutcal business transactions. Jndgment was given leaviDg a bilance in 'a-or of Tudball of £8 Oa 5Jd. Goodger v Thompson, £2, keep of a horse for a fortnight. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. Delamain v Bet?, 15a, for hire of a trap. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. Judgments went by default for plaintiffs in King v Mason, £6 3b ; Delamain v Reutoul, £1 ; Mulligan and Co. v Nelson, £6 2s 2d ; Nathan and Co. v Infield, £4 18s ; Pasoh v Orlandi, £2 7s ; and Klitgenstein v Hughes £5 Oa 6i. Judgment was for plaintiff without dispute in Nathan v Phillio, £5 sa. Knowsley v Craw and Jackman v Miller were adjourned till August 15th; Barnard vL»mbert, Fox and Co. v Cameron, Delamain v Cuff, and H. Sudley v Yeoman, till August Bih.