Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT QUITE) SO DECISIVE AS IT WAS BUT A I/ITTLE MORE OVERWHELMING. 1 WE CHALLENGE the representative of the Singer Sewing Machine Company, or any of the jurors on Sewing Machines at the Exhibition who voted for the report coming from that body to controvert the following statement of facts. Messrs Meddlnga, Cnnnlogton, Dale, and Kirk, wo call upon you to defend your report. H, C. FISKB & CO. Christchurch International Exhibition, Juno 15th, 1882, REPORT OP COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS. To H. C. Fiske & Co. BEAR SIB, —In accordance with your request, we have examined the New Davis and the New Singer Sewing Machines, for the purpose of comparing them. In our comparison wo have takoa into consideration— 1. 1 he mechanical principle Involved 2. The quality of the material med 3 The degree of workmanship exhibited 4. The facility for doing a good ai»d varied o ass of work. After taking both machines asunder, carefully examining every piece, and fully testing their capabilities, we have no hesitation in saying that wo consider the Davis far the superior machine of the two. Our reasons are as follows : In both machines the seme method is adopted for actuating the needle bar, viz., a crank with roller working in a cam. This cam la the Davis Machine is out out of a solid piece of steel and hardened, while In the Singer it is not only very much lighter, but is made of common oast iron. The feed apparatus of the two machines are very dissimilar. That of the Singer is the usual slip feed. The Davis has the vertical feed peculiar to itself. In this arrangement the pressor foot holds the material firmly down till the needle has reached its lowest point. The pressure is then relieved and transmitted to the feed bar. Feed her, needle, and material are then, by a very simple contrivance, moved forward simultaneously the required length of stitch. Motion is givm to the shuttle In the Davis machine as follows An eccentric at tha wheel end of the main spindle gives motion to a vertical lever. This in turn transmits It through a ball joint of Ingenious construetlon to the only moving part under the machine, a pivotted lever having at Its end l an adjustable shuttle carrier. In the Singer Machine a pair of mitre wheels drive a vertical spindle, havieg at its lower end a crank. A connecting rod from this crank moves a sliding shuttle carrier. It will be seen that in the Davis there are between the main spindle and the shuttle four points of friction, the pivot oanying the vertical lever, the eccentric, the ball joint, and tha pivot of horizontal lever. The two principal movements, the eccentric and the ball joint, are adjustable, and the parts most liable to wear are made of hardened steel. To compass the same work the Singer employs as points of Motion the tooth of the mitre wheels, the two journals of vertical spindle, the two ends of the connecting rod, and the sliding shuttle carrier None of these places are adjustable. The small wheels are common cast iron, having a certain amount of backlash, and consequent tendency to rattle and and break. The connecting rod Is a thin bar of iron, with a hole In each end. The end which runs on the crank pin is one of the principal joints in the machine, having a considerable amount of work to do with small bearing surface, making it very liable to wear, while, as before remarked, there are no means of compensating for any wear, It will be notloed that the shuttle of the Singer Machine is carried in a slide, to which a lateral strain is given by the driving rod, causing a certain amount of friction, while in the Davis it is carried by the lever quite free from Motion. With the exception of the small roller working the needle bar, there is not a single piece in the Singer Machine, not even excepting the shuttle, that cannot be cut with an ordinary pocket knife, and there are no means of adjusting any wearing part. In the Davis not only aro most of the pieces made of steel, and tempered, but at every essential point means are provided for taking up any wear. On this point we may say that where we had any doubt about the quality of the material employed the the piece was broken and the fracture carefully examined. Having examined the mechanical arrangements of the two machines, wo tested their adaptability for work, and we notloed the very peculiar feed of the Davis, In this respect we have been forced to the conclusion that for all purposes, sewin from the thinnest muslin to even thron h a metal spoon, the Davis has no paralle grasp, or for avoiding that puckering ofien the effect of the pressure on a fere motion feed. We mnat In common honesty express our astonishment at the range and variety of work accomplished by tho Davis, which we are satisfied cannot be done by the Singer. In snmmarifiog our report we repeat that we have no hesitation in saying that wo regard the Davis as very superior to tho Singer In workmanship, material, and the mechanical principles involved, and also in performing a greater range of work. We found the Davis to work with equal ease from the lightest to the heaviest fabric, JOHN LEE SOOTT (Scott Bros.),

Mechanical Engineer. T. GLUYA3 PABCOE, Manager of the Kaiapol Clothing Factory, GB'X p. ANTHONY, Mechanical Expert, from Nettlefold’s, Birmingham. 8300 W. M. Rob bets, PRACTICAL TAILOR, MANCHESTER STREET SOUTH, Wishes to call special attention to his FOUR GUINEA SUITS, Also to his GUINEA TROUSERS, Which for Style, Fit and Quality is unsurpassed 5-29 in Christchurch. 1002 BOOTS, BOOTS. BOOTS. i ARGE SHIPMENTS of the above are JLi arriving by frequent Orient and P. and O. steamers via Melbourne. The stock is well assorted, and will be found very complete, and should command the attention of all classes of customers. There is not any similar stock to select from in Christchurch, The quality of the goods and the lowness of the prices mast commend themselves to all who pay the establishment a visit. All the goods are shipped direct from the manufacturers, and consequently can be, and ore, sold very cheap. W. H A EK 1 s - IMPERIAL BOOT DEPOT, OPPOSITE “ PRESS ” OFFICE. 908 THE HOLIDAYS. THE CHEAPEST SHOP IN TOWN FOR All kinds of Pipes, meerohaum and wood. Cigar and Cigarette Holders, Knives, Purses, Matchboxes, Razors, Combs, Brushes, Hair Oil, Lime Cream, & ~ &o N.B.—A lot of CRICKETING MATERIAL from last season very cheap. And last, but not least, a HAIR CUTTING SALOON, Whore yon can get fixed up for the email sum of FOF, Tr? H. OAKEY, 9-105 High atißeti.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18820714.2.9.5

Bibliographic details

Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2580, 14 July 1882, Page 2

Word Count
1,143

Page 2 Advertisements Column 5 Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2580, 14 July 1882, Page 2

Page 2 Advertisements Column 5 Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2580, 14 July 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert