Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTERIAL.

OHBIBTOHUBOH. Wednesday, August 10. (Before J. Nugent Wood, E,q., 8.M.) OIYID Oases. — Kerr v Bevin, £5 9s for groceries, Ac,, supplied. Judgment for plaintiff with costs of Court and solicitor’s fee.—Mr Joyce for plaintiff. Bowem v Gillin and Devery, £36 ss. Mr Loughrey for plaintiff, and Mr Button for defendant. This was a claim for balance of commission on the sale of a hotel. Plaintiff claimed at the rate of 2J per cent, on £1450, the amount of cash paid by the purchaser. Defendant now resisted the claim on the ground that a special agreement for this service for £ls had been made between the parties. £7 had been paid into Court. After some evidence had been taken Mr Button applied for a nonsuit, as plaintiff was an uncertificated bankrupt. Mr Loughrey objected to this, as there was nothing to prevent plaintiff from suing for work and labor done, under which category he maintained the present claim came. Mr Button then withdrew his application. It appeared finally that the cash obtained by plaintiff’s agency was only £llOO, the balance being the result of a separate negotiation by one of the defendants, and judgment was given for plaintiff for £27 10s, less the amount paid in, with costs of Court and solicitor’s fee, £2 2s.—Tisoh v Qarety, £6 7s 6d ; judgment for plaintiff for £3 11s 6d.—Garety v Tisoh, £SO; judgment for defendant. Hegarty v Hyde, £3 16s ; judgment for the plaintiff, without costs.— —Judgment west for plaintiffs by default in Thomas v Hutchinson, £1 15s; v Staite, £4 4s; v Maher, £2 16s 4d; v Baldwin, £1 5s ; v Todd, £5 15a 4d; Oherrill v Hewlings, £2 8s; Harris v Stevens, £2 10s Gd ; Same v Lund, £2 15s. Adjournments were made till August 17th in Milsom v Ferguson and Wagner v Home, and till August 24tb in

Hobday and Co. v Taylor, Bussell y Smith, Thomaa y Holmea and Lostor v Hedge.

Thursday, August 11. [Before Messrs J. Olliyier, J. B. Parker, and B. Westonra, J.P.’s.]

Dbunkhnnbs—Wm. Warner, for being found drunk was fined 10a. For being drunk and committing an aot of indecency in the North Park on Wednesday morning, Hamilton King and Elizabeth Price were fined £5 each, or one month’s imprisonment with hard labor. Peter Brown, remanded from the Bth inst. for medical treatment, was now [brought up and fined 10s. Larceny.—Maurice Harper, alias Morgan ' Harper, was charged with stealing from John Hopelhnrat, of Yaldhurst, a suit of clothes, a hat, and a looking-glass, valued at £3, on August 10th. The accused, when brought into the dock, shook violently as if suffering from delirium tremens, but the police saic. they had reason to believe that this was mere sham, and the Bench concurred in that opinion. He was remanded till Saturday next for the production of evidence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18810811.2.13

Bibliographic details

Globe, Volume XXIII, Issue 2295, 11 August 1881, Page 3

Word Count
472

MAGISTERIAL. Globe, Volume XXIII, Issue 2295, 11 August 1881, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL. Globe, Volume XXIII, Issue 2295, 11 August 1881, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert