BICYCLES.

Globe, Volume XXIII, Issue 2172, 10 February 1881, Page 2

BICYCLES.

The case of Dudley versus Briggs heard in the District Court yesterday and the day before, in which the plaintiff was non-suited, calls attention to the general question of bicycle riding. Now we have not a word to say against these most useful implements, provided the interests of the public are seen to by the riders thereof. But it is no use denying the fact that the said riders are not always as considerate towards pedestrians and others as they might be. Bicycles are practically noiseless, and the manner in which they occasionally whiz past an individual when on a footpath is calculated to shake the strongest nerves. In England bicycles have been ruled to be wheeled vehicles, and have been compelled to pay at toll-bars in consequence. There they also carry bells, even in day time, a most useful practice. Indeed, in the Old Country their position appears to be gradually becoming recognised. But in New Zealand the bicycle and its rider has not yet been classed by either scientists, magistrates, or the public. They dash np and down the footpaths, noiseless and clangorous. They frequently run at nights without any light, and generally they are looked upon with terror by nursemaids, old ladies, and even by persons more active and not so easily frightened. Their introduction is no doubt a boon to a large number of people, ,but the majority of persons are prevented, by circumstances over which they have no control, from indulging in the exercise, and the fair interests of the majority should decidedly be seen to. One improvement at least might at once be started in the direction of all bicycles carrying small bells. The cost would be a mere fraction, and the danger to the public would be much diminished thereby.