Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. BROWN'S MEETING, ASHLEY.

On Tuesday evening a very large meeting of electors gave Mr Brown a most enthusiastic reception at Ashley. MrJ. A. Cunningham, chairman Ashley Road Board, in the chair. At the conclusion of bis speech, Mr Brown said, in reply to Mr John Q-orrie, that the railway management committee had for three days considered the question of the weighing of produce at railway stations, and that from the evidence of officials it seemed quite beyond the power of the department to guarantee weights to farmers, and that the balf-penny per bag was charged not for weighing, which they did in their own interests, but for giving certificate of weights.

To the Chairman—Mr Brown said that there was no chance of the House listening to a proposal to endow Road Boards in the same way as Corporations. The general impression throughout the colony was that the Canterbury Road Boards were very well off.

To Mr Fawcett—There did seem some legal grounds for Government detaining £IOO,OOO for Lyttelton harbor works for the present, but none whatever for £124,000 for surveys. To Mr A. Wilson—He had brought the question of a dray bridge before both the Atkinson and Grey Ministries, but both Mr Carruthers and Mr Maxwell reported against attaching it to the railway bridge, and that it would be cheaper to build a separate one. This was beyond their means at present. Owing to his representations the traffic manager was ordered to reduce the tariff from Ashley to Rangiora. To Mr Truman—Both owner of property and lessee should be compensated if hotel

licenses were withheld by the action of the Local Option Bill.

To an Elector—There was a vast difference between a licensed victualler and a licensed carrier, and the latter had no claim if his occupation were destroyed by the action of the Government, as his fees were paid simply for the use of the roadway. He should not compensate those who would build hotels after the passing of the Local Option Bill, but those who had invested their all under existing laws deserved consideration if the people decided to do away with their licenses.

To Mr Ellwood—The licenses were not granted for more than twelve months, but were renewable without even application, if the provisions of the Aet had been complied with.

Mr Fawcett moved, and Mr Truman seconded, a vote of thanks and confidence, which was carried most enthusiastically. In returning thanks, Mr Brown referred to the moral support such a warm reception gave to a member, and said that if his constituents did not confide in him he would at once resign.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18780718.2.15

Bibliographic details

Globe, Volume XX, Issue 1380, 18 July 1878, Page 3

Word Count
437

MR. BROWN'S MEETING, ASHLEY. Globe, Volume XX, Issue 1380, 18 July 1878, Page 3

MR. BROWN'S MEETING, ASHLEY. Globe, Volume XX, Issue 1380, 18 July 1878, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert