PAPERS RE ABOLITION.

Globe, Volume VII, Issue 724, 14 October 1876, Page 3

PAPERS RE ABOLITION.

[BY TELEGRAPH.] (Per Press Agency.') Wellington, Oct 13. The following is the full text of the papers laid on the tables of the Houses last night re the Abolition Bill, and not previously published:— June 21st, 1876, My Lord, I have the honor to enclose a letter which has been addressed to your lordship by Sir George Grey. 2. This letter was received by me about an hour before the sailing of the last mail, and after my despatch bag had been closed and sent to the post-office, and as it was one ■which could not be forwarded by mo without comment, T was of course obliged to hold it over till this mail. , . ~ 3. Sir George Grey is pleased to state to your Lords hip that “ no such opportunity, as in a free co’intrv is allowed to its inhabitants of expressing their opinion upon the destruction of their constitution and the substitution of another for it, has yet in this case been afforded to the rnhabitants of New Zealand.” I am perfectly aware that it is hard to convince Sir George Grey that any decision can be right which does not coincide with his own preconceived opinion ; but undoubtedly the question of abolition or non-abolition was the distinct issue raised at the last election, and there was no one who pressed the matter more strongly, or used bis influence more', strenuously, than Sir Geo. Grey, he having consented to be put in nomination for the Thames district after he had been returned for Auckland City West, with the view, by his own personal influence, of preventing the return of an abolition candidate by that constituency. 4. Sir G. Grey then goes on to compare the subordination of the Provincial Councils to the Colonial Legislature to that which exists between the latter and the Imperial Parliament, and claims therefore that the Provincial Councils should be consulted

before their privileges can be taken away by an Act of the General Assembly. It appears to me, however, that he entirely omits a circumstance which utterly destroys the parallel which he attempts to draw. The Parliament of England, although undoubtedly supreme, very wisely, while legislating on colonial matters, refrains from enforcing the regulations which it has passed until confirmed by the Legislature of the colony affected. But what Sir George Grey entirely overlooks is the fact that the Imperial Parliament is elected by constituencies who are unconnected with the colony, and probably, to a great extent, are ignorant of its feelings and requirements ; whereas the General Assembly and the Provincial Coun cils are elected on exactly the same fran chise; the former represent the 'general interest of the whole colony, while the latter are elected to manage purely local matters, and are, in their nature, chiefly of a municipal character. 6. That the proposed change in the constitution of the colony is a matter of general policy, is a point which admits of no question ; and to suppose that the legislation of the General Assembly on a matter of this importance should be subservient to the will of one or more of these local councils, appears to me to be utterly untenable. But admitting for the sake of argnment that such a thing were possible, how could it be carried out in practice ? There are in this colony nine provinces. Supposing that five or possibly seven of these local councils decided in favor of abolition, and the remainder opposed it, how is the question to be decided? Are the majority of the Councils to carry the day, or is the population of each profince to be taken into consideration, or is the provincial system to be abolished in those provinces which agree to the proposal and retained in those which oppose it ? With all deference to Sir G. Grey’s experience, it appears to me that he has taken up a ground which is entirely indefensible. 7. The General Assembly is elected by the people of this colony under a very liberal franchise, and, without in any way wishing to prejudice the decision at which it may arrive on the subject of abolition, I believe that it is as well able to express and carryout the general requirements and wishes of the community, as the Assembly of any other colony in the world ; and, at any rate in my opinion, it is the best and only constitutional mode by which the real feeling of the country can be obtained. 8. It seems to me, also, that the calculation into which ho has gone with regard to the relative population of Auckland and Otago and the rest of the colony is equally unsound. Whether such a system may be right or wrong, equal electoral districts form no part of the British constitution, as evinced by numerous constituencies in England, especially in London. By the constitution of this colony the legislature has full power to alter or increase the representation of the colony, but they have

not seen fit to adopt equal electoral districts, and what I would ask, would be said of anyone in England who would venture to deny the power of Parliament to carry out such changes as it considered desirable, upon the ground that one portion of the country was not as fully represented according to population as another. 9. Sir G. Grey also omits to inform your Lordship that, although possibly the majority of the members from the province of Auckland are opposed to the abolition of the provincial system, that feeling is certain y not unanimous, except perhaps in the city of Auckland and its immediate neighborhood Neither does he state that in May last year, a resolution in favor of abolition was carried by a majority of five in the Provincial Council litself, and was only rescinded the next day by a majority of one, at the direct instigation and diction of Sir George Grey himself. I think therefore he is hardly justified in claiming the whole of the province as adopting his views. 10. That the Legislature has power, under the Imperial Parliament, to make the change proposed by the Abolition Act, is, I think, amply proved by the fact that your Lordship has informed me that Her Majesty will not be advised to disallow it. 11. As regards the concluding portion of his letter, were it not that Sir George Grey most emphatically assorts his belief in the report to which he alludes, I should certainly have treated it as a bad joke, and even now I hardly know how to treat such a preposterous idea in a serious manner. That Sir G. Grey should seriously inform your Lordship that he believes that there is the slightest foundation for the report which he says exists that the opposition to the Ministry might involve the city of Auckland in a bombardment by her Majesty’s ships, or that he should consider it incumbent upon him to ask your Lordship to send a telegraphic message to me to dispel all apprehensions of her Majesty’s forces being used for such a purpose, I think a sufficient proof of the spirit and tone in which he has entered into this controversy.! 12. Sir G. Grey contents himself with endorsing the truth of the report without stating the source from which he obtained it. I can only say that I never saw it, and if 1 had, I should have looked upon it as a pure invention, circulated for party purposes, and should have treated it with the same contempt that I am convinced it will receive from every man, woman, and child in Auckland, except, I am bound to say upon his own assertion, by Sir G. Grey. 13. Were I as much inclined to take alarm at absurd rumours and newspaper canards as he seems to be, I might indeed inform your Lordship that on more than one occasion Sir G. Grey himself has been reported to have indulged in dark and mysterious hints

at the possibility of armed resistance to the law being resorted to by those who are opposed to the abolition of the provinces, and the same tone has been more frequently adopted by the JEoening Star, a paper in Auckland, which strongly supports his views. But placing, as I do, entire reliance on the loyalty and good sense of the inhabitants of , this colony, I have hitherto treated them as empty threats. As, however, Sir G. Grey ■ has seen fit to make this formal com- ; plaint to your Lordship, I now distinctly i charge him with being himself the first to give currency to a report similar to the one he has brought under your Lordship’s notice, ! and in support of this accusation I enclose to your Lordship the copy of a letter which has been addressed by Mr Dargaville to my ' private secretary for my information. I 14. Mr Dargaville was at the time a member of the Provincial Council of Auck- > land, and the occurrence he narrates i occurred about a year before the meeting of i the General Assembly, and consequently i before the Abolition Bill was before the i public, The circumstance came to my know* j ledge soon after it took place.

15. The conversation narrated by Mr Dargaville is so identical with the language used in Sir G. Grey’s letter to your lordship that there can be little doubt that it must; have been the origin of the report of which he now complains. It is therefore not surprising that he should state —“I am so entirely satisfied of the honor and good faith of the paper from which t quote that I feel sure there are substantial grounds for the statement it contains.” But in my opinion it would have been more ingenuous on his part if he had stated at the same time that he himself hud been the first to give expression to such an idea. 16. Sir G, Grey, when he wrote this letter to your Lordship, must from his long expe rience as a Colonial Governor have been perfectly aware of the fact that the Government of a colony have no control whatever over her Majesty’s forces, and that they could under no circumstances be brought into action except through the intervention of the Governor himself. To suppose, therefore, that it could be possible for her Majesty’s ships to be used for the purpose of cannonading the city of Auckland, he must in the first place have presumed that I had entirely lost my senses before I could be induced to make such a requisition to the officer in command of Her Majesty’s ships, and in the second, that that officer must have been equally mad to comply with it. 17. I beg to append a memo from my Government, to whom I submitted Sir G. Grey’s communication. I have, &c, Normandy, The Right Hon the Earl of Carnarvon, Ac.

1. Mr Dargaville to Private SecretaryNorthern Club, Auckland. June Bth, 1876.—My dear Maling,—l was surprised yesterday when reading in the Herald Sir George Grey’s letters to Lord Carnavon to find the following passages :“ I heard that in two ’ parts of the colony reports had been circulated that Her Majesty’s seamen and marines are to be used to put down, by armed force, all opposition to the Ministry, &c.,” and “ that opposition to the Ministry might involve the city (Auckland) being cannonaded by the mea of war in the harbor also, “I feel sure there are substantial grounds for the statement.” Mow I can assure you that this monstrously absurd canard, which every intelligent man in the province treats with ridicQle, was first given currency to by Sir Grey himself some twelve months ago, during the list session of the Auckland Provincial Council. Mr Reader Wood, the Provincial Secretary, intimated to the Council that it was the intention of the Superintendent to assume control of the police force within the province. Upon hearing that, I, as member for Auckland City East, gave notice of a

motion affirming the desirability of the police remaining as they were under the control of the General Government, ‘The motion was subsequently carried by a large majority ; but one evening just before the debate came on, I remember holding along conversation on the subject with Sir G. Grey, who endeavored to dissuade me from going on with it. In the course of that conversation he expressed himself, in as nearly as I can recollect, the following words—“ There may come a time when, in some conflict of authority between the Proviso,,,! and Central Governments, i should find myself

seriously embarrassed by reason of the control of the police being out of my hands,” and upon my expressing astonishment at what his words implied, ho went on to say, “ Yes, and what’s more, I can easily believe it within the range of possibility that we may yet see a British man-of-war in that river (the Waitemata), with her guns pointed towards the city to coerce us into submission to some intolerable measure of the Government at Wellington.” I could not help laughing at the outburst, which, however, was uttered wit> apparent sincerity, and much earnestness. That evening and next day I related what had occurred to several gentlemen, who all ridiculed Sir George Grej’s notion. During the last session of the General Assembly, a telegram from the Wellington correspondent of the Auckland Evening Star appeared in that paper, attempting to give further currency to the canard, which Sir George Grey affects to have heard now for the first time. I cannot find that any section of the press, so far, has attempted to justify Sir G. Grey’s conduct in this matter, and every supporter of his here with whom I spoken on the subject, expressed regret that he should have magnified, what at most could be only idle street gossip, into matter of sufficient importance to treat it as worthy of communication to the Imperial Government. I think it only my duty to write you this letter. You can show it to Lord Normanby if you think fit. I have, &c, J. M. Daegavilie, Captain Maling, Government House, Wellington. Memorandum for his Excellency— Wellington, 12th June, 1876, Ministers have considered the letter to Lord Carnarvon from Sir George Grty, dated June 6th, which his Excellency his been asked to forward to the Secretary if

State, and which his Excellency has inferred to his advisers for any remarks thu may desire to make. 2, Sir G. Grey more and more gives wa; to an irrepressible desire to write long despatches threatening legal proceedings and harping upon fancied grievances and baseless rumors. 3, It is scarcely necessary to assure the Secretary of State that there is no ground whatever for the rumors to which Sir G. Grey refers. 4, Ministers hope his Excellency will express to Lord Carnarvon their regret at the annoyance to which he must feel himself subjected by having to take notice of these long and purposeless letters written to him by a colonist of New Zealand. The general feeling in the colony is certainly averse to giving to the Secretary of State needless trouble, or asking him to interfere in matters relating to the colony.— Julius Vogel."

Memorandum for his Excellency—Wellington, October 12th, 1876.—-Referring to the telegrams addressed to the Right lon the Secretary of State for the Colonies by the Superintendent of Auckland and |ho Superintendent of Otago, copies of whch were forwarded by their Honors to (is Excellency, and by his Excelleity were transmitted for the informatin of the Government, Ministers resnectfuly advise his Excellency to telegraph to tie Secretary of State that in their opinion thfe is no reason to fear upon the coming ito operation of the Abolition of Provincts At,

1876, any such consequences as those predicted by the two Superintendents. _ The Counties Bill intended to provide machinery for really local Government, with which to replace provincial institutions, has been passed by the House of Representatives i>y large majorities, and in the Legislative Council the Bill has been read a second lime without a division. H. A. ATKINSON. Copy of despatch from Governor to Earl Carnarvon • Wellington, October 12th, 1876,—Superintendents of Auckland and Otago have sent telegrams to your Lordship direct, forwarding copies to me (copies laid by me before Parliament). Ministers advise no reason to fear the consequences predicted, in which entirely concur. Counties Bill to replace provinces passed Lower House by large majority. Second reading passed Council without division. Nobmanby,