AN INDIGNANT WITNESS.
A paper in Pittsfield, Mass., relates the following:—" They were trying a. 'horse case' in Court the other day and the lawyer was questioning a .witness in reference -bp the animal's. habits and disposition. '. Have you ever driven her ?' was ■ asked. ' I have,' was the reply. 'Was there anyone with you at the time?' .was the next question. 'There was a lady with me,.'the witness answered, and blushed a little. 'Was she a good, driver?' was the next question, the lawyer referring to the animal, but the witness understood that he. meant the lady. ' She was,' he replied. ' Was she gentle and kind?' asked the legal limb, and the reply was in the affirmative, though the witness, still thinking of the lady, looked a little surprised. ' She didn't kick ?' was the next interrogation, and a'decisive 'No' was the answer. ' She didn't rear or kick over the traces, or put her hind feet through the dashboard* try to run away, or act ugly, or'—the witness was boiling; oyer with indignation by this time, and interrupted the lawyer with, 'Do you mean the horse or the lady ?' I mean the mare we're talking about counsel> ; was 1 the response, ' I thought you meant the gal' And wiith t-this"explanation the piirsuit of justice wasresumed." ..
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18750113.2.13
Bibliographic details
Globe, Volume II, Issue 186, 13 January 1875, Page 3
Word Count
214AN INDIGNANT WITNESS. Globe, Volume II, Issue 186, 13 January 1875, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.