Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DEADLOCK ENDED

COMMONS AND LORDS AGAIN IN UNITY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BILL COMPROMISE PEERS ACCEPT COMMONS’ AMENDMENT (British Official Wireless.) (Received Feb. 6, fi.o p.m.) RUGBY, Feb. 5. Shortly after midnight the House M Commons accepted without division the Government’s proposals for a compromise with the House of Lords on the Unemployment Insurance Bill. The Government’s proposal, which was endorsed by a full meeting of the Parliamentary Labor Party yesterday morning, was to accept the Lords' amendment, committing the operation of the Bill to one year, and then to pass another amendment, extending this limit to three years. In announcing the Government’s decision, the Prime Minister declared that the Lords’ amendment was on encroachment on the House of Commons’ privileges and interference with the rights of the Commons to determine how the money was to he spent. Air Churchill, on behalf of the Conservative party, agreed with the Government’s decision, but emphasised that under the Parliament Act the House of Lords retained its bargaining pjower. They could and should bring into legislation any advisory element.

Sir 11. Samuel announced the Liberal assent, and said the Liberals would always support the privileges of the Commons. The dispute in this case, however, as too small that the Bill could not be sacrificed. Lord Parmoor, for the Government, moved in the House of Lords to-day. the compromise amendment passed by the Commons. He said the compromise amendment did not delete tbe time limit imposed by the House of Lords upon the operation of the Bill, but extended the limit of one year to June, 1933. Lord Salisbury, for the Conservatives. said he did not intend to ask the House to refuse 'the motion, which was thereupon passed without division.

The deadlock betv< en the Leraand the Commons ever this matter lies thus ended.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19300207.2.37

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXX, Issue 11125, 7 February 1930, Page 5

Word Count
299

DEADLOCK ENDED Gisborne Times, Volume LXX, Issue 11125, 7 February 1930, Page 5

DEADLOCK ENDED Gisborne Times, Volume LXX, Issue 11125, 7 February 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert