LAWYER’S ALLEGED MISDEEDS.
CASE AGAINST F. H .BRUGES 0 avithdraavn.
Press Association. GHIUSTCHUIICH, .-.larch 1Frauds Henry. JJruges, Christchurch solicitor, -on was charged in the lolicc Gouit jiterday morning, on the 111 ti: sC.f William Edward Broun, or o )nil„ UiH-n. of converting moneys W 3 , s trustee, to his own use, and with having been accessory to tK theft of money 3 by one James G Mr V. U. Day was on the Bench, and Detective Bishop sau that the case had been remanded a fortnight ago m order to g n « notice an opportunity to make anqxunes. In the meantime the papers in the case bad been submitted to the Crown Law Officers in Wellington with the result that the police had been advised to take no further action in tlm matter. His Worship said that either one of two things had occurred, either the police had been badly advised when they undertook the prosecution, or the processes or the Court had been misused, it appeared to him (and would probably so 'appear to most people), that eithei the persons who' laid the charges had no proper grounds for doiji„g so, or that the charges were laid with the intention of recovering monies by criminal process., winch they coul»i not have obtained by civil process. Tho case would bo struck out.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19080302.2.19
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2129, 2 March 1908, Page 3
Word Count
222LAWYER’S ALLEGED MISDEEDS. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2129, 2 March 1908, Page 3
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in