ARBITRATION COURT.
Press Association. DUNEDIN, September 9. At tho Arbitration Court Smith and Co., tailors, were fined £2 and costs on a charge of failing to execute an order for bespoke work on tho premises, and the D.I.C. w r as similarly dealt with on a charge of the samo nature. Walker, carpenter, was fined £5 and costs for failing to indenture an apprentice. Wm. Duncan was fined £5 with costs tor employing a man at less than the minimum wage prescribed under the carpenters’ and joiners’ awards, and James Flynn was fined 10s with costs for accepting less than the minimum wage. A charge against Scott Bros., contractors for tlie new dock at I ort Chalmers, of employing men at rough carpenter’s work and paying less than the award rato of wages was dismissed. and a ehargo against the Roslvn Borough Council of employing two linen on concrete work and paving them lass than the rate prescribed by the general laborers’ aw'ard was witli-I'-v.vn. On a charge of failing to Imv wages weekly or fortnightly the Iloslyn Borough Council was ordered to pay inspector’s costs, the Court holding that the breach was only accidental.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070910.2.41
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2181, 10 September 1907, Page 3
Word Count
195ARBITRATION COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2181, 10 September 1907, Page 3
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in