Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHY SALES DWINDLED

Mr. Tliomas Stevens was awarded 1 £I6OO damages in tho King’s Bench division the other day, in the action I he brought against Messrs. B. I I Brown and Co. for wrongful dismissal. The plaintiff was for 25 vears London manager to the defendants, an American boot polish company. In May last he was summarily demised. although ho had then a seven years’ agreement, dated 1903. It j was shown that the company’s business had declined, but the plaintiff said this was not owing to anv fault of his, but was due to the firm cutting down their advertising. The followi.ncr remarkable figures showing the I relation between the profits and advertisements were produced:— Spent on Adverts. Profits 1880 £l3O £264 1881 244 904 1882 654 1683 1900 ISO 560

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070705.2.45

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2124, 5 July 1907, Page 3

Word Count
133

WHY SALES DWINDLED Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2124, 5 July 1907, Page 3

WHY SALES DWINDLED Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2124, 5 July 1907, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert