Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IRISH COUNCIL BILL

LORD CREWE’S ATTITUDE

Lord Crewe is actually, if not nom-

inally, the Government's leader in the Houso of Lords. He expressly stated, in a speech at Doncaster earlier in the session, that the Government’s Bill (not then published) was “not incompatible with a larger policy,” nor did ho see liow “any measure giving a furthor share to tlio Irish people in the management A their own affairs could very well bo incompatible with an advance at some future day, if tlio people of the three kingdoms dosired to see that advance made.” Concerning which a newspaper critic commented: “Lord Crewe though a member of the Ministry tho Scad of which has already committed ’’imsolf to the ‘larger policy’ in re-

;ard to Ireland, is showing what oo’ks like a proper filial respect for tho susceptibilities of tlio. Earl of Rosebery, whoso son-in-law ho is. Lord Rosebery’s first weakening on the question of Home Rule was iiiuicated, it will be remembered, by his references to the necessity of convinc-

■ng tho ‘predominant partner.’ Though differing in terms, that is not very different in essence from convincing ‘the three kingdoms.’ ” Other members of the Government, while denying that the Bill is Home ltnle, have affirmed ,like Lord Crewe, that : t is not incompatible with a future advance in that direction; and have argued that no Reform Bill could be mtroduced without being open to the criticism that it is an instalment to-

wards Home Rule. For instance, the .ord Chancellor, Lord Loreburn,

Rated in the House of Lords: “Just as it was said all roads led to Rome, io lie said that whatever change was .made Ireland could not be touched without a step towards Home Rule being taken—the Home Rule of a subordinate Parliament, and not of a separate Parliament, which latter lie would never support.” Mr. Redmond, Leader of the Nationalists, has declared that nothing will settle the Home Rule question but .a free Constitution for Ireland, such as that granted to the Transvaal.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070604.2.9

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2097, 4 June 1907, Page 1

Word Count
337

IRISH COUNCIL BILL Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2097, 4 June 1907, Page 1

IRISH COUNCIL BILL Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2097, 4 June 1907, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert