APPEAL COURT.
PRESS ASSOCIATION Wellington, yesterday,
In the Appeal Court, in the Gisborne case of Hcmi Tipuna v. the Assets Company, Ltd., which was a question of costs, Mr Justice Chapman read, the judgment of the Full Court, which was that the fees paid to counsel could not be hold to be “ necessary payments ” within the moaning of that term in table C in the schedule of the Supreme Court Act and Code.
The Appeal Court gave judgment to-day in the Hawke’s Bay case of Peddle v. Orr, argued on October 23rd. The question involved was specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. Tho Court dismissed the appeal, with costs on the highest scale, as from a distance, ,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19061114.2.21
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XXIV, Issue 1932, 14 November 1906, Page 2
Word Count
121APPEAL COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXIV, Issue 1932, 14 November 1906, Page 2
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in