Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

(pew Press Association.) Wellington, yesterday. The Appeal Court was occupied to day with the hearing of the appeal, Commissioner of Taxos v. Miramar Lind Co. Judges Stout and Cooper had held that the Commissioner had no olaim against the Company for iocome tax in respeot to profits gaiood on a single transaction ; that the words in sab-section 3, section J 59, “ locome derived from business," oaniU not apply to one traneaotion. Tho poei* tion is that the Company bought 535 sores of Miramar for £26,250 in May, 1902, and six mouths later sold the whole property for £78,225. Upon the difference of these amounts the 1 Commissioner claims income tax.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19060424.2.27

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1731, 24 April 1906, Page 3

Word Count
112

APPEAL COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1731, 24 April 1906, Page 3

APPEAL COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1731, 24 April 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert