Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EDUCATION BILL

BISHOPS’ PROTEST.

WARNING OF THE TIMES.

By Velagraph, Presa'Atn’n,. Copyright London, April 11.

Dr. Oasarielii, Roman Oathol'o Bishop of Salford, Manchester, deolares that Mr Birrell’s Education Bill is without a redeeming faatnre. It compels Catholics to support a system wbioh they are unablo to use and of which they do not approve. It means, praotioally, the confiscation of Roman Catholic sohools.

Received 10.42 p.m., April 12.

LandoD, April 12.

Thirty-two of the bishops of England and Wales, assembled at Lambeth Palace, resolved that the Education Bill as it Stands mast unhesitatingly be opposed. The Times states that Mr VV. Runoiman,. MP. for Dewsbury, speaking at Newcastle, warned the Arcbbiehop of Canterbury that if he attempted to use the House of Lords as in 1902, with the hope of wrecking the wishes of the House of Commons, it would make the disestablishment of the Church of England inevitable and shake the House of Lords to its oundationa,

" BRUTAL ACT OF CONFISCATION.”

B* telegraph, Pnn Atw’n, Copyright

Reoeived 10.30 a m , April 13. London, April 12.

Bishop Btindle, Catholic Bishop ot Nottingham, states that the Education Bill is a brutal aot of oonfisoatiQD. Received 12.5 a.m., April 14.

London, April 13

The Primrose League is agitating the question of education throughout the country, protesting against the endowment of one kind of religions teaching by means of fands to which citizens of all religions are compelled to contribute. The Canadian system of allowing ratepayers to allot the rate to a particular type of school is growingly in favor amongst opponenls of tbo Bill,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19060414.2.37

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1724, 14 April 1906, Page 3

Word Count
262

EDUCATION BILL Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1724, 14 April 1906, Page 3

EDUCATION BILL Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1724, 14 April 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert