PERJURY CASE.
(Per Press Association.) Auckland, last night An unusual incident broke the mono tODy of the Supreme Court yesterday morning. A prisoner named Joseph Gar diper had been found guilty of having committed perjury in tbe Hamilton Magis trate’s Court by denying on oath that he had acoused his wife of infidelity with a policeman at Taumarunui. In giving their verdict the jury had reoommended olemency on the ground that accused’s mind was disturbed by his extraordira-y domestic surroundings. Before announcing sentence, His Honor Mr Justice Edwards made some strong comments upon Mr Lundon'e conduct of the ease, specia’ly with reference to tbe evidence given by prisoner’s two ohildren, particularly a boy, foreign to the matter unjer tria', end only intended to degrade I their mother, jibe prisoner’s wife,
Mr Lundon protcg'pd against the suggestion that he knew that anything these people had said was false. The brief was banded to him containing the boy’s statement, before ever he saw or heard the boy. His Honor then proceeded so address prisoner, and denounced in strong terms his action in going into the witness bos to again commit perjury and in *■ tutoring little ohildren to defame their mother. You are not," said His Honor, “ wholly responsible for your dofence. Thai re sponsibility. rests on other shoulders in pert, but you are responsible for your own perjury, commiltad in this box yesterday, and you are responsible for bringing those little children into Court, the boy obviously telling a tissue of falsehoods of a most absurd character, with no object except to defamo their mother, who is still your wife.” .If the prisoner had any complaint to make about his wife, he could have proceeded against her on the civil aiflA and nrf,if,innod f.m a
oner’s conduct deserved very sevpre punishment. Tho law limited sentence to seven years, but in consideration of the jury’s recommendation he would pass a comparatively light sentence of one year's imprisonment.;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19051202.2.15
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1617, 2 December 1905, Page 2
Word Count
324PERJURY CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1617, 2 December 1905, Page 2
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.