MARRIAGE A -FAILURE.

Gisborne Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1427, 11 April 1905, Page 2

MARRIAGE A -FAILURE.

settler I A •HUSB'AJNpD.’IS- STRANGE IN suia bo TUATION. ! gh not I . before INTENDED, .VISIT TO GISBC on No. I ' _ escrip- (Per Press Association.) obtain I •*„ - f AUCKLAND, last night. to bo Mr Dycrf S M na 7 Sf C Cal^ e befor ° S -M., to-day, wuen Mr Brookfield, acting on behalf of Mrs Ahcc Leo, charged Harry Lee, a butcher's assistant, witli beings abftut to desert his wife.' Z!k I caso was brought into Court' fr <«a Lee that ho gbt tvouid support his wife. Com- donee 3 LC Q h “ a T some remarkabeovN ;gram m ? r L J?} J d} sh “ said.,, been ndon, mAi r , * live years, and her husband with I i 7 ga in Sbe handed the Magarket wi , tc a tele Ktam which she said ntter iland f ucl^and 'V ber husband, asking, her Zea irL 150111(5 to , him to New Plymouth, fid! S’ y, ’ S “°^ er had ' h^S Court- ' vh ® n ., shoml, the telegram Ju liJll r ld 2t Was 0310 be sent, viver | -lurs L,ee, continuing her ■ evidenc^^v bcr husband went ters, .on Friday to New Plymouth, an ana. | mm. A r s h e 110 come he re'?u a I w^" t 0 Aucklanid. Her husband the had t brown up a permanent si'tua- y cest inon which he had held for five * per I years in order to go aWay to Waite- ' 10 1 * au . ri hecausa the young woman had and a situation there. • Her inland did ket I not deny that he kept company with' ,- the woman. Last Tuesday, wheii I witness heard that he was going tq 'H S,° i W , ,th the woman, she' asked a 11 7 bat lo was going'to. do in re- A Surd to maintaining hen ?■ Lee re- T j plica, ■ I will not maintain you, •*, and jyheraver she goes, I will go.« '- lihe young woman, added the witm mss, had told her; that she theught j I -Leo was an njhmarri'&d roan. 1 - a- Defendant : Did you not lock th o A iy floor when T canjo in ? ‘ ca 1 1. Irs Lcc : No ; another lady did, 10 I b u t y° u Sot out through the id I window. , . I 3m- kce. in reply to questions,, k 1 said iicr husband had never made obI ’Options to the company she kept., Brookfield informed the Court 1-lLJiafc he Was nofe asking for a main- S itcnance order, as 'defendant could | not work at the present moment. I. Lee replied that, be was quite wil) r , l a ug to maintain his wife if lie’ wasi I not bound down to stay in AuckI land. Ho said that he could End * I sureties to guarantee that ho would N 4 not leave Auckland without provi'dI ing for ■ his wife’s support, and he - was ordered %o provide two sureties iOf £SO each,. -