FISCAL QUESTION.
CHAMBERLAIN AND SALISBURY
By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright Received 10.14 p.m., March SO. London, March SO. Sir Michael Hicks-Beach. in a letter to the Timos, says that while the late Lord Salisbury was doubtless awars of Mr OhamberJoin’s views on colonial preference, yet he (Sir Miohael Hicks-Bsach) was confident that neither Lord Salisbury nor the Cabinet had even authorised Mr Chamberlain to propose or aocept at a colonial conference thß principle of preference, especially in foodstuffs. * The Times says. that Lord Salisbury’s objections to Mr Chamberlain’s proposals wore mostly founded on tactical considerations ruther than tho question of principles.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19050331.2.13
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, 31 March 1905, Page 2
Word Count
99FISCAL QUESTION. Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, 31 March 1905, Page 2
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in