Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SPITEFUL BROTHER

SCATHING COMMENT BY JUDGE EDWARDS.

X'Pcr Press Association.) . Auckland, lost night. A cage oamo boforo Mr Justice Edwards a 6 the Supromo Court, in which ono brother charged another with forging and Uttering a deed of agreement at Wkaagaroi. The accused was Goorgo MoOonnod, who p>aaaod not guilty. After hearing ovidonce his Honor summed up, and said this was a most lamentable and extraordinary- ease. It was exceedingly lamentable to find one brother prosecutmg another on a charge of forgery. By no way of reasoning could it bo oonoeived to bo the duty of a brother to take such a step as this. It might by an extreme view bo held to be his duty to inform tho polioe, but in this ease they found Bobert MoConnell at vory groat expense to oonduot tho wl°' Bnt *. brought him down hero from Whangarei press tho case in evory possible way against his brother. Presumably it was at his oxpouse. Certainly ho hoped it was not at tho expense of the State. In all his'Honor’s oxperipboe in a court of law, he had never before seen suoh a proceeding on tho part of one brother against another, and ho hopod'not soon to see it again. It certainly " showed very great spite on tho part of the prosecutor, and deliberate intention on his part to' oru3h nis brother in aoivil suit which was pending, and the circumstance must undoubtedly make the jury view tho action with a very considerable amount of suspicion. The story which the accused man George McConnell had told-in the witness box was, he would confidently assure tho jury from his judioial experience, an exceedingly probable one, and one borne out by documents and by tho story of their preparation. He had absolutely no hesitation in telling the jury that the thought the prisoner onght to be' acquitted. The jury, without retiring, found the prisoner not guilty, and he was discharged.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19050213.2.27

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1378, 13 February 1905, Page 3

Word Count
324

A SPITEFUL BROTHER Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1378, 13 February 1905, Page 3

A SPITEFUL BROTHER Gisborne Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1378, 13 February 1905, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert