Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH POLITICS.

THE FISCAL CAMPAIGN.

By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright London, Nov. 15.

The Duke of Marlborough, speaking at Carlisle, said ho was confident the country would ultimately decide to draw a protective circle round Great Britain and the colonial dependencies, securing resources greater than the largest of Empiros, and becoming self-sustained. Mr Foster, spoakiDg at the annual ban-

quet of tho Anchor Society, Bristol, said the Cabinet was protectionist up to the hilt. The Government ought straightforwardly to toll tho country what it meant. Mr Chamberlain’s and tho Government’s policy were identical, and both were dangerous to trade, manufacturers, agriculture, and the working classes, wealth and progress, and would tend to disintegate tho Empire and the union at present founded on something other nobler than mere huckstering. Sir Michael Hieks-Beach,. while steadfastly opposing Mr Chamberlain’s unauthorised programme, said he was prepared to support Mr Balfour’s policy. He admitted that foreign tariffs and dumping had seriously injured the British exports and some industries. Unholy trusts and combinations were also injurious. He opposed both illegitimate dearness and cheapness, through the operation of trusts and tariffs. The Government’s policy in penalising foreign exports unless protectionist countries treated us fairly, was the policy embodied in the sugar convention, and might be applied with great advantage to other home industries. It was essential to trust tho Government to recognise that an ample cheap supply of coal and raw material was necessary for Britain’s welfare if the choice lay between standing absolutely on the old lines or a genuine change of fiscal policy. “ I prefer the latter. I concur with Mr Balfour’s remarks about the favored nation clause. While negotiating the Sugar Convention, I was much struck by the immense importance foreigners attached to our Freetrade market, and their intense fear of being deprived of it. If the British Government obtain power to negotiate, they will be able to employ two great levers, fear lest foreign countries be deprived of tbe British market, and, secondly, a growing popular dislike of European countries to the burdens of protection, I do not believe the destinies of the country safe in Badical hands.” „ Both Mr Balfour’s and Sir M. HicksBeach’s speeches were delivered at tbe annual dinner of the Dolphin Society,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19031117.2.18

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 1049, 17 November 1903, Page 2

Word Count
371

BRITISH POLITICS. Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 1049, 17 November 1903, Page 2

BRITISH POLITICS. Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 1049, 17 November 1903, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert