Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Workers’ Compensation.

CONTRACTOR NOT A WORKMAN,

By Telegraph—Press Association. Napier, last night. The Arbitration Court to-day delivered judgment in the Dunnevirke case, William Henry Smith v. John Clark, claim for compensation. Smith took a contract to fell bush for Clark, and during the period ho was working he met with an accident, for which he claimed half pay for eighteen weeks for total disablement, and £IOO for disablement. The Court decided that claimant was not a workman within the meaning of the Aot, arid disallowed the claim, awarding costs to respondent,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19020426.2.7

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume VII, Issue 400, 26 April 1902, Page 1

Word Count
91

Workers’ Compensation. Gisborne Times, Volume VII, Issue 400, 26 April 1902, Page 1

Workers’ Compensation. Gisborne Times, Volume VII, Issue 400, 26 April 1902, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert